On 2 Feb 2010, at 17:52, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Unless I am missing something, the question to be answered is if
Guile requests opening modules using a name like
module.so (assuming a particular naming scheme),
module.la (using libltdl as originally intended), or bare
module (using
Hi,
Hans Aberg hab...@math.su.se writes:
On 2 Feb 2010, at 17:52, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Unless I am missing something, the question to be answered is if
Guile requests opening modules using a name like module.so
(assuming a particular naming scheme), module.la (using libltdl
as
Hello,
[Adding Cc: bug-guile since it’s relevant.]
Aubrey Jaffer a...@alum.mit.edu writes:
| Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:37:50 +0100
| From: Petr Gajdos pgaj...@suse.cz
|
| On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0500, Aubrey Jaffer wrote:
| [...]
|
| Okay. I conditionalized the 3
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Hans Aberg wrote:
On 2 Feb 2010, at 15:20, Ken Raeburn wrote:
On Mac OS X (trying it on 10.5.8 PPC G4), guile-1.8.7 cannot open
dynamic library files with name extensions .dylib, but only if they
are renamed using .so instead. On the Bug-Guile list they say it
just calls
