() Neil Jerram
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. "correct" would mean
that the bug, and hence the fix needed, is in the code that the
warning is pointing to. As opposed to the warning-generation
code itself being bugged.
OK, that's what i sus
Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> () l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> () Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100
>
>> Is the warning correct?
>
>Of course it is! :-)
>
> I don't understand the question or the answer.
> (That is, what does "correct" mean?)
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. "corre
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100
> Is the warning correct?
Of course it is! :-)
I don't understand the question or the answer.
(That is, what does "correct" mean?)
Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way?
thi
