Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> And welcome back! :-)
>
Thanks -- and thanks in return for looking into this!
> Andreas Rottmann skribis:
>
>> Andreas Rottmann writes:
>>
>>> [...] I isolated the cause; the following snippet hangs on Guile 2.2
>>> and 3.0, while it worked as expect
Hi,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe skribis:
> That function marks the working stack no, what about stack segments in
> continuations will they be marked correctly as well?
Oh you’re right, from a quick look at continuations.c, a continuation’s
stack appears to be conservatively scanned (allocated with
Hi Matt,
Matt Wette skribis:
>>From 71ff7e79369a4514a961fc5cf76593b254c32d4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Matt Wette
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:12:37 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] 2020-03-22 Matt Wette
>
> * configure.ac:
> Provide new option: --disable-tmpnam
> This is made available for inst
Attached is the git patch against the following guile commit:
bef5e0b3938cc88e3a1a1ac590b009875cc38162
>From 71ff7e79369a4514a961fc5cf76593b254c32d4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Wette
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:12:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] 2020-03-22 Matt Wette
* configure.ac:
Provid