Dale P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
guile (help string)
`string' is a primitive procedure in the (guile) module.
- primitive: string. chrs
- primitive: list-string chrs
Return a newly allocated string composed of the arguments, CHRS.
strings.c:103: wrong position for argument
Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Golubev I. N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To allow guile work with native awk it needs at least one patch.
We already have a fix for SCO nawk in CVS. Does it help?
might not, if the version of SCO is different, or something.
and I just tested
Masao Uebayashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm compiling a CVS tree just updated and get the following error.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I./.. -I../libltdl -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wp,-MD,.deps/gc.pp -c gc.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gc.o
../libguile/gc.x: In function `scm_init_gc':
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Guile - CVS page on savannah contains incorrect information about
checking out CVS modules. It states that I have to do
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/guile co guile-core
to check out guile-core, but that gives
Dirk Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does the produced file "check-guile" get installed? (please forgive my
autoconf/make ignorance). If so, is it possible to have it _not_
installed? IMO, it is sufficient if "make check" works from the build
directory after "make install" has been
Matt Wette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did a "cvs update" on guile today.
In guile-core I ran "autogen.sh" then "configure --prefix=/opt/guile"
and then "make". The compile failed because of no "force". configure.in
is adding "-dlpreopen force" to the load ...
what version of libtool do
Keisuke Nishida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems the current Guile does not do properly tail-call
when a procedure is called through map.
I may be wrong, as I'm very out of practice wrt reading the Guile
evaluator code (ouch), but here is what happens:
`map' is implemented as a primitive,
Martin Wilck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think there is a bug in the (ice-9 syncase) module.
does it help to use
(use-syntax (ice-9 syncase))
instead of
(use-modules (ice-9 syncase))
?
--
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
I'm schizophrenic...
And I am too.
Dirk Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
oops, the whole pagesize stuff slipped in by mistake, it's not even
needed.
will fix, thanks you.
--mike, for whom the thing did compile on Solaris. hmmm.
--
It is impossible to sharpen a pencil with a blunt axe. It is equally vain to
try to
