Hi Thien-Thi,
On Fri 15 Jul 2011 18:25, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
semantics changed while name unchanged is basically a big fat ‘set!’
to the libguile API.
Very true. It seems that maintaining a library is an exercise in
managing mutation -- mutation of your software from
Hi Bruce,
On Wed 13 Jul 2011 17:11, Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org writes:
On 07/13/11 06:41, Andy Wingo wrote:
the new interface name is libguile-2.0.so.
Well, yes, but for source distributions, it gets compiled and linked
against whatever the current platform's default Guile happens to be.
I
Hi Bruce,
I'm not sure what the bug report here is. I'm getting a lot of angst
though :-)
On Mon 11 Jul 2011 15:28, Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org writes:
The intent is that I have several functions: raw-shell-str, shell-str,
c-string and kr-string each of which produces precisely the same byte
Hi Andy,
On 07/13/11 01:48, Andy Wingo wrote:
I'm not sure what the bug report here is. I'm getting a lot of angst
though :-)
:) Not angst so much as mild irritation, some of it stirred up residuals
from the 1.4 - 1.6 - 1.8 transitions. I was only just recently able
to drop Guile 1.4
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:41:42 +0200
I realize that this is irritating to you, but it is the right thing,
improves the situation for loads of users, and is largely compatible.
I think when you say it is the right thing, you are missing the point.
Try to jump up
On 07/13/11 06:41, Andy Wingo wrote:
No need to shout, thank you. I agree with you. However in this case we
are covered: the new interface name is libguile-2.0.so.
Sorry. It's hard to get nuanced vocal inflections encoded into text.
Too much emphasis, I guess.
You happened to run into
Hi Elias, et al.,
On 07/09/11 15:11, Elias Pipping wrote:
with autogen 5.12 and guile [top of tree] I get a test failure that
I do not get with the same version of autogen and guile 2.0.2.
The failing test is string.test.
It fails because instead of ending with \001\002\003\377 as expected,
a
On 07/11/11 07:09, Elias Pipping wrote:
I meant write:
with autogen 5.12 and guile 2.0.2 I get a test failure that I do not
get with the same version of autogen and guile 2.0.0.
Ah, right. I took a guess at intentions. But, it doesn't matter.
The fact is I was told by folks on the guile
