Andy Wingo agreed on IRC to accepting UTC, since we've since discovered
that not only various web servers, but also some transparent web proxies
put UTC in the date header, which was causing problems for many people.
So, I've pushed a change to stable-2.0 to accept UTC.
On Wed 03 Apr 2013 09:59, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué aconchi...@gmail.com writes:
=
184: 1 [read-header #input-output: gnutls-session-port 2e94c30]
754: 0 [parse-asctime-date Wed, 03 Apr 2013 07:29:49 UTC]
web/http.scm:754:6: In procedure parse-asctime-date:
web/http.scm:754:6:
On 3 April 2013 20:32, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org wrote:
() Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com
() Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:47:22 +0800
Interesting. Though this does gradually erode the type barrier
erected by the web module. I am reluctant to cede this territory.
I suppose playing
Hi,
I was doing a test using gnutls and connecting to twitter api
services. Example attached.
I successfully passed the TLS/SSL part, but then I got this HTTP bad
header issue. I am running Guile 2.0.5 from Debian/unstable but
current stable-2.0 branch also suffers from the safe problem (I
On 3 April 2013 15:59, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué aconchi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was doing a test using gnutls and connecting to twitter api
services. Example attached.
I successfully passed the TLS/SSL part, but then I got this HTTP bad
header issue. I am running Guile 2.0.5 from
() Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com
() Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:47:01 +0800
Apparently we are supposed to do this a bit more and accomodate yet
another non-compliant service?
Maybe that stuff should be exposed to the user. Do a best effort
conversion and if not successful, return a pair
On 3 April 2013 18:33, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org wrote:
() Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com
() Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:47:01 +0800
Apparently we are supposed to do this a bit more and accomodate yet
another non-compliant service?
Maybe that stuff should be exposed to the user. Do
Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com skribis:
RFC 2616 _requires_ http date values have a suffix of GMT
What about adding an exception for “UTC”? :-)
It’s the same timezone, only with a different name, so it shouldn’t cost
us much.
WDYT?
Ludo’.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com skribis:
RFC 2616 _requires_ http date values have a suffix of GMT
What about adding an exception for “UTC”? :-)
It’s the same timezone, only with a different name, so it shouldn’t cost
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
aconchi...@gmail.com wrote:
This is what I did locally so I could continue testing. But
unfortunately, it's is very likely that there are more broken servers
around. The permissive flag seems like an all-or-nothing, so I think
Thien-Thi's
10 matches
Mail list logo
