bug#38672: Core records and R7RS records

2020-01-12 Thread Andy Wingo
On Thu 19 Dec 2019 17:24, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen writes: > I've read in the news that the upcoming Guile 3.0 will unify records. > > Core records type seem to support the procedure "record-accessor", > which takes a field name as a symbol. > > In R7RS (based on SRFI 9), record field names are, h

bug#38672: Core records and R7RS records

2019-12-20 Thread Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
Am Do., 19. Dez. 2019 um 18:48 Uhr schrieb John Cowan : > > While I esteem Marc's work highly, I have to say that his message above is > incomplete and tendentious. He links to SRFI 150, written by him, in which > he links to a message by Alex Shinn (R7RS-small editor and Chibi implementer) > i

bug#38672: Core records and R7RS records

2019-12-19 Thread John Cowan
While I esteem Marc's work highly, I have to say that his message above is incomplete and tendentious. He links to SRFI 150, written by him, in which he links to a message by Alex Shinn (R7RS-small editor and Chibi implementer) in support of this view. This is a single message in the thread < htt

bug#38672: Core records and R7RS records

2019-12-19 Thread Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
I've read in the news that the upcoming Guile 3.0 will unify records. Core records type seem to support the procedure "record-accessor", which takes a field name as a symbol. In R7RS (based on SRFI 9), record field names are, however, (hygienic) identifiers and thus compile-time and not run-time