It is the same bug. The r7rs define-library expands to a r6rs library, which
expands to a guile module form that lacks support for multiple libraries. The
solution would probably include a non-trivial (but probably not very big)
change to guile's module system.
First you would have to save and
On 2021-12-01 11:00 +0100, Linus Björnstam wrote:
> This is in line with the limitations of guile's R6RS implementation. I
> think this is a long standing, low priority bug. It has to do with the
> expansion of library (or define-library in this case) not properly
> resetting the current module.
>
Hi Sam!
I am not a maintainer , nor a very proficient guile hacker, but I do have some
input.
This is in line with the limitations of guile's R6RS implementation. I think
this is a long standing, low priority bug. It has to do with the expansion of
library (or define-library in this case) not
Guile is unable to handle more than one define-library per file. For
example, this is "mylibs.sld", which contains two define-library:
(define-library (example mylib)
(import (scheme base))
(export f)
(begin
(define (f x)
(+ x 1
(define-library (example main)
(import
