() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100
Is the warning correct?
Of course it is! :-)
I don't understand the question or the answer.
(That is, what does correct mean?)
Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way?
thi
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100
Is the warning correct?
Of course it is! :-)
I don't understand the question or the answer.
(That is, what does correct mean?)
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer.
() Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. correct would mean
that the bug, and hence the fix needed, is in the code that the
warning is pointing to. As opposed to the warning-generation
code itself being bugged.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi,
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
find that symbol anywhere...
Yes, we all see these warnings. The idea
Hi,
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi,
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
find that symbol
Hi,
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
find that symbol anywhere...
Yes, we all see these warnings. The idea is that someday someone will
be annoyed
There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
find that symbol anywhere...
(This is from a make clean ; make, but i unfortunately deleted
the *Compilation* buffer.)
thi
