Re: segfault on incorrect code

2004-02-13 Thread Kevin Ryde
Oops, I see I was beaten to it with a simpler approach. ___ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: segfault on incorrect code

2004-02-13 Thread Kevin Ryde
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > guile> (define (foo a b c) (< b c)) > guile> (sort '(3 2 1) foo) Thanks. I get some joy from the change below, but someone smarter than me will need to verify that it's the right approach. The "if" conditions are cut and pasted from scm_trampo

Re: segfault on incorrect code

2004-02-12 Thread Marius Vollmer
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Seeing a thread named "core dump" remembered me an old bug I > stumbled upon years ago (in guile 1.3), but never reported. > It seems to be still present in recent versions. Fixed, thanks! 2004-02-13 Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

segfault on incorrect code

2004-01-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Seeing a thread named "core dump" remembered me an old bug I stumbled upon years ago (in guile 1.3), but never reported. It seems to be still present in recent versions. % guile guile> (version) "1.6.4" guile> (define (foo a b c) (< b c)) guile> (sort '(3 2 1) foo) zsh: segmentation fault guile