bug#24076: gnupg [-agent]: when signing [commits], it claims that there is no pinentry - but there is

2016-07-28 Thread Alex Kost
Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-27 14:01 +0300) wrote: > Hi, > > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > >>> My ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf file reads this: >>> >>> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >>> pinentry-program /home/ludo/.guix-profile/bin/pinentry-gtk-2 >>> --8<

bug#24076: gnupg [-agent]: when signing [commits], it claims that there is no pinentry - but there is

2016-07-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-27 14:01 +0300) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Danny Milosavljevic skribis: >> My ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf file reads this: --8<---cut here---start->8--- pinentry-program /home/ludo/.guix-profile/bin/pin

bug#24076: gnupg [-agent]: when signing [commits], it claims that there is no pinentry - but there is

2016-07-28 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
> Another option would be to change ‘gnupg_module_name’, in homedir.c, from: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > case GNUPG_MODULE_NAME_PINENTRY: > #ifdef GNUPG_DEFAULT_PINENTRY > return GNUPG_DEFAULT_PINENTRY; > #else > X(bindir, "pinentry"); >

bug#24087: recovery from suspend is broken with recent libreboot + linux-libre 4.7

2016-07-28 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, > I know more people than just me are using libreboot here, do you have > any problems with suspend and recovery? I have a X200 and some time after waking up from suspend on the first larger disk access it hangs, losing all the dirty sector payload in the process. This is Guix-specific, the

bug#24092: installation of password-store doesn't require installation of tree

2016-07-28 Thread Thompson, David
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Tomáš Čech wrote: > I installed `password-store' and simple invocation failed: > > $ LC_ALL=C pass > Password Store > /home/tcech/.guix-profile/bin/pass: line 324: tree: command not found > > After manually installing `tree' package it works as expected. > > A `

bug#24008: [doc] write an official statement on bundling

2016-07-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
ng0 skribis: > It would be an good idea to have an official statement on why we > do unbundle dependencies and bundling should be avoided, > similar to the one Gentoo has: > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Why_not_bundle_dependencies Fixed in d222522edf70cdac6cee7b4ab8fa1bfbf0a7ba9c. Ludo’.

bug#24097: ‘operating-system’ lacks a way to populate /run/modprobe.d

2016-07-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
See the example at: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2016-07/msg00231.html Ludo’.

bug#24099: A policy on how to choose the installed documentation formats.

2016-07-28 Thread ng0
I don't think we have what this thread talks about covered in the manual. If we do have though, consider this bug obsolete. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00603.html > > Info > HTML > man > txt > PDF > PS ? > Roughly, yes. Not the same message, but in the thread: >

bug#24060: Test (tests/publish.scm) still fails after fix

2016-07-28 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi, I tried running the tests against commit 37402ecb4379d7199dd4b3386488261938edc780, but this time the test fails for a different reason. Does it succeed for you? --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ make check 'TESTS=tests/publish.scm' make check-recursive make

bug#24087: recovery from suspend is broken with recent libreboot + linux-libre 4.7

2016-07-28 Thread ng0
Hi, Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi, > >> I know more people than just me are using libreboot here, do you have >> any problems with suspend and recovery? > > I have a X200 and some time after waking up from suspend on the first larger > disk access it hangs, losing all the dirty sector payloa

bug#24076: gnupg [-agent]: when signing [commits], it claims that there is no pinentry - but there is

2016-07-28 Thread Alex Kost
Danny Milosavljevic (2016-07-28 15:04 +0300) wrote: >> Another option would be to change ‘gnupg_module_name’, in homedir.c, from: >> >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> case GNUPG_MODULE_NAME_PINENTRY: >> #ifdef GNUPG_DEFAULT_PINENTRY >> return GNUPG_

bug#24060: Test (tests/publish.scm) still fails after fix

2016-07-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Chris Marusich skribis: > I tried running the tests against commit > 37402ecb4379d7199dd4b3386488261938edc780, but this time the test fails > for a different reason. Does it succeed for you? Yes. Is this new failure systematic, or does it occur randomly? > publishing /home/marusich/guix/