Leo Famulari writes:
> However you are replying to these bug reports is changing the "Subject"
> line to only include the bug number. It's hard to know what the bug is
> about...
I did not want to reply directly to these specific bugs, which is why I
asked on this list first.
> On Tue, Sep
Sorry, I was in such a hurry that I forgot to tell the version of
Epiphany. It's version 3.22.0.
I have changed the themes to test if the icons would appear.
# Before
Window: "Trisquel" (from one "trisquel"-related package???)
GTK+: "Trisquel" (from "trisquel-gtk-theme" package)
Icons: "Trisquel
Would it be difficult to change the format?
What's needed to provide iso in addition to what we have now or just
iso? Has someone looked into this?
--
ng0
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:50:44PM +, ng0 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firefox 47.0.1, windows 7: no broken css.
It looks broken to me in Debian's Firefox 45.3.0 and Chromium
52.0.2743.116.
ng0 writes:
> Hi,
>
> Firefox 47.0.1, windows 7: no broken css.
>
> Is this enough to close this bug?
Otherwise I'd say we need more input on how this specific firefox
renders the page, the implemented css support, the proof that the person
who reported this bug has experienced this bug with no
see subject.
thanks
--
ng0
Hi,
Firefox 47.0.1, windows 7: no broken css.
Is this enough to close this bug?
--
ng0
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I just did this:
>
> guix build -S xfce
>
> This resulted in this error message:
>
> ~~~
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 157: 18 [catch #t # ...]
> In unknown file:
>?: 17 [apply-smob/1 #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 63: 16 [call-with-pr
