bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:22:15PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote: On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:51:18PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > This will take effect for the next release of Guix; it addresses a > problem that arises when somebody install

bug#25775: Attempts to fix bootstrap Guile bug

Hello, Thanks Andy & Ricardo for the detailed explanations! Andy Wingo skribis: > It seems that this bug is related to the introduction of > url-fetch/reset-patch-level. It takes a #:guile kwarg but defaults to > #f; if not given #:guile, that #f propagates through instead of a > package objec

bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:51:18PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > This will take effect for the next release of Guix; it addresses a > > problem that arises when somebody installs the binary release of Guix. > > > > I'm not addressing d

bug#19973: Grafts break debug outputs

Mark H Weaver skribis: > mhw@jojen:~$ guix build guile > guix build: warning: ambiguous package specification `guile' > guix build: warning: choosing guile-2.0.11 from gnu/packages/guile.scm:110:2 > /gnu/store/3lhr8q28q6f59774di9av7ncy09jd55d-guile-2.0.11 > /gnu/store/rgv3fvy6xqp6966rfh8v6fv7m48a

bug#25752: go incremental builds broken

Hello, Hank Donnay skribis: > The function for determining staleness is here (after the giant > comment explaining the reasoning): > https://golang.org/src/cmd/go/pkg.go#L This method relies on the build ID to, which is defined like this (info "(ld) Options"): `--build-id' `--build-id=

bug#25865: xinit does not allow non-root startx

Hello, Alex Vestgaard skribis: > xinit suffers from an upstream bug, which does not allow non-root X to be run > without a display manager via startx or xinitrc. Several people have reported > this on #guix. > > Currently if one runs startx as non-root, X reports: > (EE) parse_vt_settings: Can

bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:51:18PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote: On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > > > In my op

bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix

On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > > > > > In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages a

bug#25976: man page version is outdated in Guix 0.12.0 tarball

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Now that I think of it, could it be that Ricardo didn’t have help2man > installed when building the tarball? Man pages get rebuilt anytime it’s > needed here. This could have been the case. I don’t usually have it installed. Sorry for screwing this up! -- Ricardo G

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

Hello sirgazil! It’s always a pleasure to read you. :-) Basically, I like all of your proposals. Some comments below. sirgazil skribis: > Navigation bar > == > > Bar mockup: > https://multimedialib.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/guixsd-menu-2017-03-06.png > > The current navigation

bug#25953: [PATCH] gnu: mesa: Build LLVM Gallium drivers.

Mark H Weaver writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Fixes . >> >> * gnu/packages/gl.scm (mesa)[inputs]: Add llvm. >> [arguments]: Build LLVM Gallium drivers. > > I'm uncomfortable adding llvm as a requirement for our most minimal X11 > system, for several reasons. C

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

Overall, I like all your proposals. The one I like best is the proposal about packages. I hope I won't hurt your feelings if I state that the new layout makes the packages thing somewhat similar to the "Software" application in Fedora. And I think that a degree of resemblance is good both for Guix

bug#26008: ‘guix offload test’ provides insufficient details upon failure

See message below. --- Begin Message --- Hi Ludo', on [2017-03-06] at 10:52 Ludovic Courtès writes: > Myles English skribis: > >> Two hosts, setup the same as far as I can see, behave differently when >> trying to offload builds, any idea how I can get more information on >> what the # might in

bug#25882: gcc-wrapper doesn't handle response files

Federico Beffa skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Federico Beffa skribis: >> >>> gcc-wrapper doesn't handle compiler/linker flags passed through >>> response files. >>> >>> One package which recently started using such files is GHC (I believe >>> since 7.10.3). For this reas

bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix

Mark H Weaver skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Leo Famulari skribis: >> >>> In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix >>> pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of >>> users who were still using the guix-daemon fro

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

Hi, I don't have very much to comment on, but I just want to express that I like the Navigation bar and Home page section changes. On 17-03-06 21:02:39, sirgazil wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose some changes to the website based on my current > perception of it and some comments I've read fr