bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

On 17/06/17 12:12, Catonano wrote: > 2017-06-17 18:41 GMT+02:00 sirgazil >: > > > Catonano, to avoid building all the packages (3-4 minutes in this > machine), you should run the build like this: > > $ GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL=yes haunt build > > Also, this way

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

2017-06-17 18:41 GMT+02:00 sirgazil : > > Catonano, to avoid building all the packages (3-4 minutes in this > machine), you should run the build like this: > > $ GUIX_WEB_SITE_LOCAL=yes haunt build > > Also, this way, the website URLs are modified to work locally, and only > 300 packages will be b

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

On 17/06/17 11:09, Catonano wrote: > 2017-06-17 17:46 GMT+02:00 sirgazil >: > > On 17/06/17 02:16, Catonano wrote: >> >> >> 2017-06-17 6:57 GMT+02:00 Catonano > >: >> >> >> >> 2017-06-16 16:46 GMT+02:00 sirgazil >

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

2017-06-17 17:46 GMT+02:00 sirgazil : > On 17/06/17 02:16, Catonano wrote: > > > > 2017-06-17 6:57 GMT+02:00 Catonano : > >> >> >> 2017-06-16 16:46 GMT+02:00 sirgazil : >> >>> >> >> I'm fine with investigating the missing parts before or after moving to >>> guix-artwork.git. >>> >> >> For what it'

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

On 17/06/17 02:16, Catonano wrote: > > > 2017-06-17 6:57 GMT+02:00 Catonano >: > > > > 2017-06-16 16:46 GMT+02:00 sirgazil >: > > > > I'm fine with investigating the missing parts before or after > moving to >

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

2017-06-17 17:19 GMT+02:00 sirgazil : > On 16/06/17 23:57, Catonano wrote: > > So I can't see the issues at > https://bitbucket.org/sirgazil/guixsd-website/ > issues?status=new&status=open > > > > > Sorry about that. The issue tracker was set to private, but I just made it > public. Also, you can

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

On 16/06/17 23:57, Catonano wrote: > > > 2017-06-16 16:46 GMT+02:00 sirgazil >: > > > > I'm fine with investigating the missing parts before or after > moving to > guix-artwork.git. > > > For what it's worth, I vouch for moving all to gnu.org >

bug#24988: Guix requests substitute for non-substitutable package

Leo Famulari skribis: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:56:17AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> $ guix package -e '(@@ (gnu packages tex) texlive-texmf)' -n >> The following package would be installed: >>texlive-texmf201

bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal

2017-06-17 6:57 GMT+02:00 Catonano : > > > 2017-06-16 16:46 GMT+02:00 sirgazil : > >> > > I'm fine with investigating the missing parts before or after moving to >> guix-artwork.git. >> > > For what it's worth, I vouch for moving all to gnu.org and possibly > expressing the issues in the appropria