Hello,
Leo Famulari skribis:
> I ran `guix pull` after this missing package warning was implemented,
> but before I pushed afc9d8ec2b724b67f (gnu: Add jmtpfs).
>
> I installed jmtpfs from a Git checkout, and then ran `guix package -u .`
>
> As expected, Guix complained that the jmtpfs package do
Mark H Weaver writes:
> I believe this problem is fixed by commit
> ffc015bea26f24d862e7e877d907fbe1ab9a9967. I was able to build a grafted
> 'hello' for i686-linux, and it worked correctly.
>
> Can you try it and report back?
Thank you! It seems to have worked.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I tried to copy the .drv files for the grafted 'glibc-final' and
> 'glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash' from my machine to Hydra, in order to
> ask Hydra to build it, but both "guix copy" and "guix archive --export"
> failed:
>
> mhw@jojen ~$ guix copy --to=hydra@h
Mark H Weaver writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> I just tried to update my GuixSD system to commit
>>> c57b56722f6c167c5a285f47802047de85a356ae on master. "guix system build"
>>> failed with the following error:
>>>
>>> guix system: error: profi
Hi Ludovic,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> I tried to copy the .drv files for the grafted 'glibc-final' and
>> 'glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash' from my machine to Hydra, in order to
>> ask Hydra to build it, but both "guix copy" and "guix archive --export"
[I couldn't find instructions on generating patches for the web pages.]
Under https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ the second occurrence of
/software/guix/guix-fosdem-hpc-part1-20170204.pdf should have "part1"
changed to "part2".
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>>
I just tried to update my GuixSD system to commit
c57b56722f6c167c5a285f47802047de85a356ae on master. "guix system build"
failed with the following error
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.4K bytes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
> > Mark H Weaver writes:
> >
> >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> >>
> >>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
> >>>
> I just tried to update my GuixSD system to commit
> c57b56722f6c167c5a285f47802047de85a356ae on maste
Arun Isaac (2017-06-26 02:35 +0530) wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure this is the right place to report this
> bug. If I should report this bug elsewhere, please direct me.
>
> When I indent the `emacs-which-key' package definition in
> gnu/packages/emacs.scm using `indent-region', the description ge
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Could you check whether “guix package -A syncthing” shows it there? The
> warning should appear as soon as we’re upgrading a package that’s
> missing.
I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing`
from the
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Could you check whether “guix package -A syncthing” shows it there? The
>> warning should appear as soon as we’re upgrading a package that’s
>> missing.
>
> I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix
Hi ng0,
config.log reads this:
> configure:9394: gcc -c
> -I/gnu/store/5cbyk5gmw2gj017d02vyibz3v6rdldz7-gnunetgf-0.10.114b59076f/include
> -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -g -O2
> -I/gnu/store/5cbyk5gmw2gj017d02vyibz3v6rdldz7-gnunetgf-0.10.114b59076f/include
> conftest.c >&5
> In file incl
ng0 skribis:
> And this is from master running an offloading test as it is right now.
> Both ends have GuixSD.
>
> user@abyayala ~$ guix offload test
> guix offload: testing 1 build machines defined in
> '/usr/local/etc/guix/machines.scm'...
> guix offload: '192.168.1.179' is running guile (GNU
Joshua Sierles skribis:
> For example, 'guix cran import RgoogleMaps' generates this line:
> (license (gpl2+ gpl3+)). Build fails unless changing the line to:
> (license (list gpl2+ gpl3+)).
Fixed in 94a400bebae48aebc35fb84aa0b134b25ce46e46, thanks!
Ludo’.
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> When removing and upgrading packages in a single invocation of "guix
> package", removed packages should be automatically excluded from the set
> of packages to upgrade.
Fixed in fc8fdcf56ecc159cb4e85ffdde60a54c4fa5c04f, thanks!
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.1K bytes:
> ng0 skribis:
>
> > And this is from master running an offloading test as it is right now.
> > Both ends have GuixSD.
> >
> > user@abyayala ~$ guix offload test
> > guix offload: testing 1 build machines defined in
> > '/usr/local/etc/guix/machines.scm'..
GNU bug Tracking System transcribed 0.4K bytes:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
> #27388: offloading: Add support for keyfile-less keys as used by GnuPG,
> which was filed against the guix package.
>
> Thank you for your report, which has now been closed.
> You can vi
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.9K bytes:
> Hi ng0,
>
> config.log reads this:
>
> > configure:9394: gcc -c
> > -I/gnu/store/5cbyk5gmw2gj017d02vyibz3v6rdldz7-gnunetgf-0.10.114b59076f/include
> > -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -g -O2
> > -I/gnu/store/5cbyk5gmw2gj017d02vyibz3v6rdldz7-gnunetgf-0.1
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Mark H Weaver writes:
>>
>>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>>
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I just tried to update my GuixSD system to commit
> c57b56722f6c167c5a285f47802047de85a356ae on master. "guix system build
Ok, fixed! :-)
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=2482c02f3b23b2490a6647e0717cf8a4ccf3f6a8
However, I think this is a hack, and the better solution would be to
actually fix the underlying indentation issue. But, I am too lazy to
find out how. :-P
20 matches
Mail list logo
