Adonay Felipe Nogueira writes:
> NOTE: This message isn't meant to sound aggressive, it's just a question
> from a novice Guix user.
>
> Here is my situation:
>
> - I'm using Guix in a foreign distribution (Trisquel 7).
>
> - In 2017-06-12, I pulled and upgraded Guix and
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:57:39PM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> Here is my situation:
>
> - I'm using Guix in a foreign distribution (Trisquel 7).
>
> - In 2017-06-12, I pulled and upgraded Guix and packages successfully as
> root.
>
> - Last weekend I did (all as root): `guix gc`
NOTE: This message isn't meant to sound aggressive, it's just a question
from a novice Guix user.
Here is my situation:
- I'm using Guix in a foreign distribution (Trisquel 7).
- In 2017-06-12, I pulled and upgraded Guix and packages successfully as
root.
- Last weekend I did (all as root):
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.2K bytes:
> ng0 skribis:
>
> > I think the method as described never really worked.
> >
> > When I do as you (and the manual) suggested, I no longer
> > have any results for ssh host env | grep "GUILE_".
> >
> > When I extend it like this it
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:20:38PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> By the way, Qualys will probably begin publishing their exploits on
> Tuesday [0]:
Here they are:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/635
It would be good if we tested the relevant exploits against GuixSD.
signature.asc
ng0 skribis:
> I think the method as described never really worked.
>
> When I do as you (and the manual) suggested, I no longer
> have any results for ssh host env | grep "GUILE_".
>
> When I extend it like this it works. I include the full
> paste to show that previously
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> $ guix build texlive-texmf-minimal --rounds=2
>
> phase `texmf-config' succeeded after 52.0 seconds
> output
> ‘/gnu/store/jfs5fsn011w64jgmpc6chcnqr1agfv6h-texlive-texmf-minimal-2016’ of
>
There were some bugs with security implications reported in Podofo
recently:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/0
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/1
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/2
I noticed some fixes committed to the Podofo SVN repo:
> I'm not sure what you mean by a "fix". This is an Emacs issue, and it
> was there since... I don't know, always.
Oh, my bad. I thought it was something related to guix-devel-mode or the
.dir-locals.el
> Moreover, I don't think it's a bug; it's just how Emacs finds a
> beginning of the
Arun Isaac (2017-06-27 11:44 +0530) wrote:
> Ok, fixed! :-)
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=2482c02f3b23b2490a6647e0717cf8a4ccf3f6a8
>
> However, I think this is a hack, and the better solution would be to
> actually fix the underlying indentation issue. But, I am too
ng0 transcribed 2.7K bytes:
> Currently vim-full in version 8.0.0494 is failing its testsuite:
…
We are able to build vim-full again. Closing.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
infotropique: https://www.infotropique.org
signature.asc
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.8K bytes:
> ng0 skribis:
>
> > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.2K bytes:
> >> ng0 skribis:
> >>
> >> > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.8K bytes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> The problem here is that
> >>
$ guix build texlive-texmf-minimal --rounds=2
phase `texmf-config' succeeded after 52.0 seconds
output ‘/gnu/store/jfs5fsn011w64jgmpc6chcnqr1agfv6h-texlive-texmf-minimal-2016’
of ‘/gnu/store/72z7v217vd976hlhyjrxzmwpqr4nzwh6-texlive-texmf-minimal-2016.drv’
differs from
ng0 skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.2K bytes:
>> ng0 skribis:
>>
>> > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.8K bytes:
[...]
>> The problem here is that
>> /run/current-system/profile/share/guile/site/2.2, which is where the
>> Guix modules are
14 matches
Mail list logo