Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:06:08PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Leo, let me know when you feel that we should start a new evaluation.
>
> First I want to ungraft today's libgcrypt and poppler replacements.
>
> I also want to apply the attached
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:06:08PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo, let me know when you feel that we should start a new evaluation.
First I want to ungraft today's libgcrypt and poppler replacements.
I also want to apply the attached patch so we can stop using
libgcrypt-1.5 with Shishi, and
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> As discussed yesterday on IRC, here’s a patch that applies the glibc
>> patches for CVE-2017-1000366 in ‘core-updates’.
>>
>> That’s a rebuild-the-world change but we still have work to do in
>> ‘core-updates’
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:22:59PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:06:45PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Efraim Flashner skribis:
> >>
> >> > On aarch64 the test 'test-package.sh' fails
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:06:45PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>>
>> > On aarch64 the test 'test-package.sh' fails due to 'offload: command not
>> > found'
>>
>> I think you mentioned on IRC
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:41:50PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Our packages of OCaml 4.02.3 and 4.01.0 are vulnerable to CVE-2017-9772:
>
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/575
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-9772
According to Debian¹ only Ocaml-4.04.[01] is
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:06:45PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
> > On aarch64 the test 'test-package.sh' fails due to 'offload: command not
> > found'
>
> I think you mentioned on IRC that the problem vanished, right?
>
> Ludo’.
The test
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Another option (perhaps slightly less intrusive) would be to implement
>> the ‘xfce’ meta-package using ‘union-build’ instead of
>> ‘propagated-inputs’.
>
> Yes, that’s better. I pushed two commits:
>
>
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> What do you think of the attached patches? The first makes libxfce4ui
>> only propagate the latest gtk+, so I added gtk+-2 where needed. The
>> second removes “exo” from the “xfce” meta-package,
ng0 skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.2K bytes:
[...]
>> > GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH="${GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH}:/run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/2.2/site-ccache:/run/current-system/profile/share/guile/site/2.2"
>> >
10 matches
Mail list logo