bug#27621: Poppler's replacement is ABI-incompatible with the original

2017-07-08 Thread Mark H Weaver
retitle 27621 Poppler's replacement is ABI-incompatible with the original severity 27621 important thanks Ben Woodcroft writes: > Currently Inkscape fails to start as the poppler shared library changes from > libpoppler.so.66 to libpoppler.so.67 upon grafting. Is this

bug#27621: [PATCH] gnu: inkscape: Use ungrafted poppler input.

2017-07-08 Thread Ben Woodcroft
Previously, inkscape failed to start, attempting to load an incorrect poppler shared library version. * gnu/packages/inkscape.scm (inkscape)[inputs]: Replace poppler with poppler-0.56.0. * gnu/packages/pdf.scm (poppler-0.56.0): Export it. --- gnu/packages/inkscape.scm | 3 ++-

bug#27621: [PATCH] gnu: inkscape: Use ungrafted poppler input.

2017-07-08 Thread Ben Woodcroft
Currently Inkscape fails to start as the poppler shared library changes from libpoppler.so.66 to libpoppler.so.67 upon grafting. Is this the correct way to fix this issue? I'm not quite sure why poppler is grafted in the first place, given there are so few dependencies (26)? Should it simply be

bug#27386: [SOLVED] Re: bug#27386: offloading documentation and env

2017-07-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Oleg, Oleg Pykhalov skribis: > Solution > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2017-05/msg00196.html > >> The ‘guix offload’ command is invoked by guix-daemon as root. So when >> it is invoked, (getenv "HOME") returns "/root" or similar. Could that

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 0/2] Make ghostscript reproducible.

2017-07-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > On Fri, 07 Jul 2017 19:51:10 +0200 > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> For CreationDate/ModDate, I think it should honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH as >> in >>

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-08 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:24:07PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > Okay, thank you for explaining this (especially if you already explained > it! It's hard to join a conversation like this halfway through). I'll > read your patches carefully later today. I didn't get around to it :/ I think that if