Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:52:02PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> From f57732d79ac265917f154da5791ff203c82c9733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Leo Famulari
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 01:46:38 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu:
Ricardo Wurmus (2017-07-26 10:59 +0200) wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
[...]
>>> This seems good to me. I just wonder if there are legitimate cases
>>> where a package regexp would look like a command line option. If that’s
>>>
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>>
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I agree that this is quite confusing. Perhaps we
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:52:02PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> From f57732d79ac265917f154da5791ff203c82c9733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leo Famulari
> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 01:46:38 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: net-tools: Update to 1.60-0.90da8a0.
>
> Fixes
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:33:08PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari skribis:
> > From 5c738ab1ec5543981c9d5e512ee94d469bcca12b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Leo Famulari
> > Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:19:56 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2]
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 25.07.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>> That's because "--fallback" was treated as the argument to -u, i.e. the
>> regexp specifying which packages to upgrade. The few compiled packages
>> were needed to run the profile hooks.
>
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>>
I agree that this is quite confusing. Perhaps we should issue a warning
if the regexp begins with "-".
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +, ng0 wrote:
> > > - Forwarded message -
> > >
> > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST)
> > > > To: ng0
> > > > Cc:
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> I agree that this is quite confusing. Perhaps we should issue a warning
>>> if the regexp begins with "-".
>>>
>>> Also, perhaps we should *always* require
Hi Efraim,
Ah sorry — I'm still not 100% confident with debbugs. I opened this one
by accident. The proper report is at 27826.
I will (try to) close this one.
Alex
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>> Please find patch below.
Opened in error. Duplicate of 27826.
Alex
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>> Please find patch below. Builds successfully with tests, verified signature,
>> and did basic sanity check in guix environment.
>>
>> I have 4 tests
Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +, ng0 wrote:
> > - Forwarded message -
> >
> > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST)
> > > To: ng0
> > > Cc: daisu...@users.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
> Please find patch below. Builds successfully with tests, verified signature,
> and did basic sanity check in guix environment.
>
> I have 4 tests that fail — I believe that may be due to my local set up, as
> 7.1.6 failed to
13 matches
Mail list logo