bug#27811: net-tools patch has no effect?

2017-07-26 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:52:02PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> From f57732d79ac265917f154da5791ff203c82c9733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Leo Famulari >> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 01:46:38 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu:

bug#27820: guix package -u: order of argument is significant

2017-07-26 Thread Alex Kost
Ricardo Wurmus (2017-07-26 10:59 +0200) wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus skribis: [...] >>> This seems good to me. I just wonder if there are legitimate cases >>> where a package regexp would look like a command line option. If that’s >>>

bug#27820: guix package -u: order of argument is significant

2017-07-26 Thread Mark H Weaver
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >> >>> Ludovic Courtès writes: >>> Mark H Weaver skribis: > I agree that this is quite confusing. Perhaps we

bug#27811: net-tools patch has no effect?

2017-07-26 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:52:02PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > From f57732d79ac265917f154da5791ff203c82c9733 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Leo Famulari > Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 01:46:38 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: net-tools: Update to 1.60-0.90da8a0. > > Fixes

bug#27811: net-tools patch has no effect?

2017-07-26 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:33:08PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > From 5c738ab1ec5543981c9d5e512ee94d469bcca12b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Leo Famulari > > Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:19:56 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2]

bug#27820: guix package -u: order of argument is significant

2017-07-26 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 25.07.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Mark H Weaver: >> That's because "--fallback" was treated as the argument to -u, i.e. the >> regexp specifying which packages to upgrade. The few compiled packages >> were needed to run the profile hooks. > >

bug#27820: guix package -u: order of argument is significant

2017-07-26 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Mark H Weaver skribis: >>> I agree that this is quite confusing. Perhaps we should issue a warning if the regexp begins with "-".

bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]

2017-07-26 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes: > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +, ng0 wrote: > > > - Forwarded message - > > > > > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST) > > > > To: ng0 > > > > Cc:

bug#27820: guix package -u: order of argument is significant

2017-07-26 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> I agree that this is quite confusing. Perhaps we should issue a warning >>> if the regexp begins with "-". >>> >>> Also, perhaps we should *always* require

bug#27825: [PATCH 0/1] Update php to version 7.1.7.

2017-07-26 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Hi Efraim, Ah sorry — I'm still not 100% confident with debbugs. I opened this one by accident. The proper report is at 27826. I will (try to) close this one. Alex Efraim Flashner writes: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: >> Please find patch below.

bug#27825: [PATCH 0/1] Update php to version 7.1.7.

2017-07-26 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Opened in error. Duplicate of 27826. Alex Efraim Flashner writes: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: >> Please find patch below. Builds successfully with tests, verified signature, >> and did basic sanity check in guix environment. >> >> I have 4 tests

bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?]

2017-07-26 Thread ng0
Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes: > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:15:47AM +, ng0 wrote: > > - Forwarded message - > > > > > Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 18:21:19 +0900 (JST) > > > To: ng0 > > > Cc: daisu...@users.sourceforge.net > > > Subject: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28

bug#27825: [PATCH 0/1] Update php to version 7.1.7.

2017-07-26 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:17:32PM +0200, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > Please find patch below. Builds successfully with tests, verified signature, > and did basic sanity check in guix environment. > > I have 4 tests that fail — I believe that may be due to my local set up, as > 7.1.6 failed to