Thank you very much for the hard work!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
We totally deny the allegations, and we're trying to identify the allegators.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I had this problem too.
Reverting commit cfbf6de18cc70d2e385feb5f61f9363f18e78ddf (gnu: mcron:
Update to 1.1 and deprecate "mcron2".) fixed it for me.
pgpXebwLkqBJM.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Chris Marusich (2018-04-09 23:38 -0700) wrote:
[...]
> Because I changed the package-full-name procedure, this also fixes the
> package names in other places, such as graphs produced by "guix graph".
I recall there was some discussion about 'package-full-name' in the past
but I remember nothing a
Hello,
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> This is really great! I’m very happy that this is finally in the master
> branch. Thank you!
It’s still not as good as we’d like obviously, but if you’re lucky, you
get pull in 5 minutes now.
> As discussed on IRC, there is a problem when running “guix pull”
Hello,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Indeed, on closer inspection, (guix config) is miscompiled and looks for
> ‘getenv’ and ‘string-append’ in a nonexistent anonymous module (the
> #{ g12345}# thing below) instead of (guile):
It turns out the ‘define-module’ form has to be spliced i
Hi,
Here's a new version of the patch. The only change is: I modified the
tests (tests/graph.scm and tests/profiles.scm) so that they also use the
package-full-name procedure's new #:delimiter keyword argument when
necessary. I intended to do that from the start, but I forgot.
Alex Kost writes
