Hello!
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
> This looks good, and indeed it’s an unintended consequence of commit
> cc1dfc202f2fefb6c2eb9467d1fc90a9154550c9.
>
> However, the log of commit cc1dfc had this:
>
>Failing to do that, "%p" would be "0" when using "ProxyCommand"
>in ~/
On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 09:50:23 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
>
> > I think it would be good to have guix check for closed-source
> > binaries after unpacking, automatically (including jar files with
> > class files in them).
>
> Oh right,
Hi
$ guix package --show=test
(no output)
Expected: error package test not found
+ you can help package it by reading the XX section in the manual
The relevant code begins on line 771 (in guix/scripts/package.scm):
(('show requested-name)
(let-values (((name version)
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:21:29PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> As to why you’re not getting substitutes, it could be missing
> authorization, etc. What does ‘guix publish’ display?
Substitutes work fine for normal package install. No problem with the
setup. No, this is specific to guix pull w
On 2018-11-08 11:07, swedebugia wrote:
Hi
I want to contribute to guix with patches and at the same time keep my
GuixSD on 0.15.
To archive this I created and followed the following guide in GuixSD
in Qemu:
https://gitlab.com/swedebugia/guix-notes/blob/master/BUILD.org
Following it Guix 2
Hi
I want to contribute to guix with patches and at the same time keep my
GuixSD on 0.15.
To archive this I created and followed the following guide in GuixSD in
Qemu:
https://gitlab.com/swedebugia/guix-notes/blob/master/BUILD.org
Following it Guix 21335fdbec68b4cfb19d8a0ae0877ec81c84ad9c
Hi,
Evaluations adding no new builds are displayed as "failing". I know
this was done on purpose, but I think the check should be done on the
number of jobs returned by the evaluator, rather than on the number of
builds registered in the database.
There is a difference because derivations that a
Hello,
Marius Bakke skribis:
>>> What about: ‘herd status | grep logind’?
>>
>> No output
>>
>> sdb@komputilo ~$ sudo herd status |grep logind
>>
>>> Does /run/user exist?
>>
>> No
>
> If you add (elogind-service) to your system configuration, Shepherd
> should work out of the box.
Indeed. The
Hello,
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> I think it would be good to have guix check for closed-source binaries after
> unpacking, automatically (including jar files with class files in them).
Oh right, jars are certainly quite common, more than .so files.
>> > No idea if it's worth the trouble/p
