Manolis Ragkousis writes:
> Hello Brett,
>
> I imagine you run `guix build hurd`?
I didn't know there was always a build log...cool. That might help me
spot some of the compiler errors.
>
> Can you share the build log?
>
> Thank you,
> Manolis
> On 11/10/18 1:47 AM, Brett Gilio wrote:
>>
>> H
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I think my first thought was that the problem (narinfo available but
> corresponding nar missing) was mostly due to our peculiar nginx setup on
> mirror.hydra.gnu.org: this cannot happen under normal circumstances
> because ‘guix publish’ really honors the expiry it sets
Manolis Ragkousis writes:
> Hello Brett,
>
> I imagine you run `guix build hurd`?
>
> Can you share the build log?
phase `unpack' succeeded after 0.2 seconds
starting phase `bootstrap'
GNU build system bootstrapping not needed
phase `bootstrap' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `patch
So, today I investigated a bit.
I found [1] and [2] interesting. I didn't do anything about [1], but I
enabled cache in my configuration.
Then I went to #dovecot@freenode and someone advised me to switch to
high-performance mode[6], which I did:
--8<---cut here---start--
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
>> This one is nice and smaller than ‘ls-lR’. I reimplemented the GNU
>> updater in terms of this file, and kept the previous FTP-based updater
>> around for GNU packages not hosted on ftp.gnu.org:
>>
>>
>> htt
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:11:34AM +0100, Björn Höfling wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2018 09:50:23 +0100
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> >
> > > I think it would be good to have guix check for closed-source
> > > binaries after unpacking, a
