bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-13 Thread zimoun
Hi Ludo, On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > The problem here is really that we fall back to content-addressed > mirrors instead of using them directly: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28659 Thank you for the pointer. Good to see that the problem is almost addressed.

bug#39449: [bug#39476] [PATCH] gnu: sane-backends: Disable genesys_unit_tests.

2020-02-13 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Leo Prikler skribis: > * gnu/packages/scanner.scm (sane-backends)[arguments]<#:phases>: > Add disable-failing-backend-tests. > --- > gnu/packages/scanner.scm | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/scanner.scm b/gnu/packages/scanner.scm > index

bug#39508: Guix cookbook: Broken hyperlink

2020-02-13 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, > If you open https://guix.gnu.org/cookbook/, and choose a language except > English, It will return 404 Not found. > Seems someone just carelessly push the cookbook and without checking the > translations. Yeah, this is a limitation in the current machinery that build the documentation

bug#39551: [PATCH v2] Cannot declare an NFS mount using the record

2020-02-13 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Howdy! Maxim Cournoyer skribis: >>From 666ce396f2a53bec4d88ee90c1612166421f3ed8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Maxim Cournoyer > Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:06:50 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] scripts: system: Do not validate network file systems. > > Fixes issue #39551

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

2020-02-13 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > building > /gnu/store/cjim33x0q1bv1ppkv3qijvr1pvsn4y0q-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2.drv... > downloading from > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/harfbuzz/release/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2... > |offloading build of >

bug#39551: [PATCH v2] Cannot declare an NFS mount using the record

2020-02-13 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Still more work needs to be done to have working NFS mounts though, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Attached is v2 of the patch, fixing the comment in the code as reported > by Tobias. > > Thank you! Naively inputting what you'd use in /etc/fstab into your record is not going to work because (gnu