On 17/10/20 11:09 pm, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas wrote:
[...]
The attached patch solves that. What do you think?
Happy hacking,
Miguel
I have tested the patch and the Installer mostly worked. One thing I
noticed is that the partition scheme I was given automatically looks
like this:
1 537M
I generated an installer for myself from
5d4ad8e1be6d60c38577e2f3d92cc5642b12eff0 + Miguel's patch (I think
unrelated to this bug) here https://paste.debian.net/plain/1167398
After the install completed I pulled out the USB as per instruction on
the screen, and pressed the Reboot button. The s
Hi Charlie,
charlie writes:
> Text as follows:
>
> ./guix/store.scm:1367:15: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args
> `(# the outputs of derivation
> `/gnu/store/4vqa9zmhhyzqca476236wbxqbv7s4b1v-guile-ssh-0.13.0-1.688d7f3.drv'
> failed (usually happens due to networking issues); try `--fallback' to
Hello!
I've noticed on multiple occasions that using Guix on traditional
spinning drives can be quite slow.
On my home machine, will is still relying on 2 x 1 TB spinning drives in
RAID1, rebuilding my user profile, which contains 182 entries, takes on
average about 20 minutes, even when there ar
On 17/10/20 11:09 pm, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas wrote:
Hi,
Brett Gilio writes:
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Shouldn’t it create a “legacy” partition table rather than GPT since
we’re on an old, non-UEFI platform?
That is my thinking as well, it should create a legacy MBR table.
IMHO the old for
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 16:30, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> (inputs
>> `(("guile" ,@(assoc-ref (package-native-inputs guix) "guile"
>>
>>
>> Or create a haunt variant named ’haunt-guix’ keeping the compatibility?
>
> Can we do that, but keep that variant in the web site’s ‘.guix.scm
Hi Danny,
On +2020-10-17 12:20:11 +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> How do I debug this?
>
> $ guix-core-updates/guix/pre-inst-env guix environment -s armhf-linux --pure
> grep
>
> needs grep (it's in the implicit native inputs), and that grep has a test
> failure.
What if the test failure
Taylan Kammer writes:
> On 15.10.2020 09:42, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>>
>>> The problem is that the ‘cond-expand’ used to define ‘arch32bit?’ is a
>>> expansion-time thing when (cross-)building Bytestructures itself, so
>>> it’s incorrect from cross-building from 64-b
Hi,
Brett Gilio writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> Shouldn’t it create a “legacy” partition table rather than GPT since
>> we’re on an old, non-UEFI platform?
>
> That is my thinking as well, it should create a legacy MBR table.
IMHO the old format should be avoided completely when possible.
How do I debug this?
$ guix-core-updates/guix/pre-inst-env guix environment -s armhf-linux --pure
grep
needs grep (it's in the implicit native inputs), and that grep has a test
failure.
So I can't actually enter the environment for building grep and running
make check
.
What now?
pgpdA
10 matches
Mail list logo
