bug#44353: [PATCH version-1.2.0 v2] guix: system: Add a new '--non-volatile' option for disk-image.

* guix/scripts/system.scm (%options)[volatile-root?]: New boolean option. (%default-options): Set its default value to #f. (show-help): Add help doc. * guix/scripts/system.scm (perform-action): Propagate option... (system-derivation-for-action): ...here. Use it to set the volatile-root? field of t

bug#44353: [PATCH version-1.2.0 v2 2/3] bootloader: grub: Skip install-grub-efi when producing a disk image.

Fixes . Every bootloader should try their best to install themselves using only the MOUNT-POINT and otherwise do nothing. This requirement comes from the necessity to call INSTALL-GRUB when installing the (non-EFI) GRUB bootloader, which needs to populate the roo

bug#44353: [PATCH version-1.2.0 v2 3/3] doc: Detail which bootloader get used with disk-image or vm-image.

* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix system): Extend doc. --- doc/guix.texi | 31 ++- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index b7f1bc1f00..e15ee4092c 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -30909,11 +30909,2

bug#44353: [PATCH version-1.2.0 v2 1/3] image: Remove conflicting user-provided EFI file system.

When the bootloader used is grub-efi-bootloader, an ESP partition and file system is already added by the image generator. If a conflicting user-provided EFI file system is provided, it will (likely) cause the boot to fail, as happens for the lightweight-desktop.tmpl and desktop.tmpl templates und

bug#44558: Mesa isn't update to date

Thanks for the feedback! Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ezt írta (időpont: 2020. nov. 11., Sze, 14:25): > Barnabás Béres 写道： > > Yes it marked as a patch > > Thanks for letting me know. That shouldn't happen, but I can't > say more without knowing more about your MUA and veering > off-topic. > > I can s

bug#44558: Mesa isn't update to date

Barnabás Béres 写道： Yes it marked as a patch Thanks for letting me know. That shouldn't happen, but I can't say more without knowing more about your MUA and veering off-topic. I can say only that it was sent to bug-guix[0], not guix-patches[0], and never had [PATCH] in the topic. Both Web

bug#44558: Mesa isn't update to date

Yes it marked as a patch Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ezt írta (időpont: 2020. nov. 11., Sze, 13:24): > Hullo! > > Barnabás Béres 写道： > > I think this email went to the wrong place, because you only > > sent a "bug > > report" not a patch. I think it's better to send these kind of > > things to > > bug

bug#44558: Mesa isn't update to date

Hullo! Barnabás Béres 写道： I think this email went to the wrong place, because you only sent a "bug report" not a patch. I think it's better to send these kind of things to bug-guix@gnu.org Does your mail client mark it as a patch? Strange. I've deleted the original, but bug-guix@ delivere

bug#44571: Cannot configure a static IPv6 with static-networking-service-type

Le 11 novembre 2020 05:56:24 GMT-05:00, divoplade a écrit : >Dear guix, > >My interface should be configured to have 2 static ip addresses, an >IPv4 address and a global IPv6 address. > >The static-networking-service-type will only accept one per device, and >will reject the IPv6 address (if I

bug#44558: Mesa isn't update to date

Hi, I think this email went to the wrong place, because you only sent a "bug report" not a patch. I think it's better to send these kind of things to bug-guix@gnu.org Best regards, Barnabas Beres

bug#44574: guix weather not checking all substitute urls

I would have assumed that it would check for all of the substitute urls I listed and not just the first one. Most of the packages listed below I've test built on my pine64 so they shouldn't appear in the list anymore. (ins)efraim@E5400 ~/workspace/guix-1.2.0$ time ./pre-inst-env guix weather -c 1

bug#44571: Cannot configure a static IPv6 with static-networking-service-type

Dear guix, My interface should be configured to have 2 static ip addresses, an IPv4 address and a global IPv6 address. The static-networking-service-type will only accept one per device, and will reject the IPv6 address (if I drop the IPv4 address) because it can't parse it. My workaround is to

bug#44552: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?

OK, will do when I merge generic-cl! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#44552: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl?

Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Pierre Neidhardt writes: > >> It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". >> I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. > > Nope, it does not :p > > So which value should we set? It's not because 6000 passes on my > machine that it will necessa