bug#29485: perl-geo-ip is broken since ever!

2020-12-02 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:34:23AM +0100, zimoun wrote: > It is a problem and the package is broken. I am assuming this package > is not used so I am proposing to simply remove it. Otherwise, the > database should be also packaged, else it appears to me meaningless. Removal sounds good to me.

bug#30027: core-updates: guile build hung during tests with defunct guile process

2020-12-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi, zimoun writes: > This old bug #30027 is about core-updates and Guile (2.2). > > > > > On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 at 11:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> While building core-updates locally on my x86_64 system running GuixSD, >> my first attempt to build

bug#44948: glade does not respond

2020-12-02 Thread Michael Rohleder
Hey Jesse, Jesse Gibbons writes: > guix environment --ad-hoc glade -- glade > The main window pops up, and so does a dialog asking if I want to take > a survey. I click to close the dialog and it doesn't respond. > My WM is xfce. > $ guix describe > Generation 342    Nov 28 2020 17:39:32   

bug#29485: perl-geo-ip is broken since ever!

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi, The old bug #29485 is about the hard coded database of the package perl-geo-ip. On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 at 15:41, ng0 wrote: > user@abyayala /gnu/store/5mhrli41qbcpns3gg0yf1vv07lvpg8hm-perl-geo-ip-1.51$ > egrep -nr "/usr/"

bug#30290: guix-daemon slows to a crawl when a substitute server is offline

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi Maxim, On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 at 22:07, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > When a substitute server used by guix-daemon is offline, the daemon will > keep attempting to connect to it, even when it shouldn't need any data > (ran 'sudo guix system reconfigure my-config.scm' multiple times in a > row. > >

bug#30087: "guix package -A" hangs with attached package set

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi Danny, This old bug #30087 is about something specific to one of your use cases. On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 at 16:50, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 07:26:31 -0800 > Leo Famulari wrote: > >> I can't reproduce this with a recent Guix.

bug#30027: core-updates: guile build hung during tests with defunct guile process

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi Mark, This old bug #30027 is about core-updates and Guile (2.2). On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 at 11:35, Mark H Weaver wrote: > While building core-updates locally on my x86_64 system running GuixSD, > my first attempt to build guile-2.2.3 got hung up

bug#29276: awesome-4.2 crashes when reloading awesome

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi, This old bug #29276 is about Awesome Window Manager reload the config. On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 at 22:24, ng0 wrote: > It's already an improvement from the last version > of awesome, but here's what I found just now (no logs): > > log in to awesome >

bug#26715: xorg-service includes xf86-video-intel unconditionally

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi Efraim, What is the status of this bug #26715? On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 at 10:16, Efraim Flashner wrote: > In gnu/services/xorg.scm it includes xf86-video-intel, which is x86_64 > and i686 only. This FTBFS on aarch64, which is not a supported >

bug#25437: awesome breaks on configuration reload

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi, This old bug #25437 is about issue with the Awesome Window Manager and the restart. I have not read any recent user complaint about this. And because of… On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 at 15:19, ng0 wrote: > At the moment I can't provide logs. …and no

bug#23874: [PATCH v2 2/2] profiles: Delete duplicate manifest entries in packages->manifest.

2020-12-02 Thread Leo Prikler
* gnu/profiles.scm (packages->manifest): Delete duplicate entries. --- guix/profiles.scm | 34 ++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/profiles.scm b/guix/profiles.scm index 034591eb79..59a313ea08 100644 --- a/guix/profiles.scm +++

bug#23874: [PATCH v2 1/2] profiles: Remove duplicates in manifest transactions.

2020-12-02 Thread Leo Prikler
* guix/profiles.scm (manifest-transaction-effects): Delete duplicate effects. --- guix/profiles.scm | 18 -- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/profiles.scm b/guix/profiles.scm index 1b15257210..034591eb79 100644 --- a/guix/profiles.scm +++

bug#23874: [PATCH 1/2] profiles: Remove duplicates in manifest transactions.

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi Leo, Thank you for working in this old bug. On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 at 23:25, Leo Prikler wrote: > entries are the same. Either way, I've now implemented a version, that > should fix both wrong-doings (see attachment). Is it a replacement of PATCH 1/2 only or both? Well, could you instead

bug#27145: document GuixSD system recovery process + document bournish and recovery/guile repl

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi, Since I get: --8<---cut here---start->8--- ** Delivery incomplete ** There was a temporary problem while delivering your message to n...@pragmatique.xyz. --8<---cut here---end--->8--- and the initial submitter

bug#23874: [PATCH 1/2] profiles: Remove duplicates in manifest transactions.

2020-12-02 Thread Leo Prikler
Hi Mark, Am Mittwoch, den 02.12.2020, 15:26 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver: > Hi, > > Leo Prikler writes: > > > * guix/profiles.scm (manifest-transaction-effects): Delete > > duplicates in > > install and remove. Let multiple upgrades and downgrades shadow > > previous > > transactions of the

bug#23874: [PATCH 1/2] profiles: Remove duplicates in manifest transactions.

2020-12-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi, Leo Prikler writes: > * guix/profiles.scm (manifest-transaction-effects): Delete duplicates in > install and remove. Let multiple upgrades and downgrades shadow previous > transactions of the same kind. > --- > guix/profiles.scm | 11 +++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4

bug#45015: [mumi] 44964 cannot be displayed

2020-12-02 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Display of issue 44964 fails because the email address is not properly split. --8<---cut here---start->8--- GET /44964 In mumi/web/server.scm: 33:9 9 (handler _ _) In mumi/web/controller.scm: 122:24 8 (_ _) In mumi/web/view/html.scm: 358:2 7

bug#25504: icecat language packs

2020-12-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi, zimoun writes: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2017 at 16:12, ng0 wrote: >> We should include the language packages icecat provides. >> >> I haven't looked into this too much, and I'm not familar with >> application localization in Guix, if there are any mechanisms in >> place for this already. > > This

bug#44925: gdm boot up failure

2020-12-02 Thread Guillaume Le Vaillant
I had a similar problem today. I booted with a system configured with Guix at 275fcffc9b5f4deb516c510b26b07c13d6e47307 and everything worked fine. Then I reconfigured with Guix at commit 04b83678653fda3c66e600e88f54f5108290ec1c, removed a few dozen old generations and did a 'guix gc'. At the

bug#31977: clone tests fail on CentOS 7

2020-12-02 Thread Paul Garlick
Hi Simon, On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 19:12 +0100, zimoun wrote: > This old bug #31977 is about an issue on your CentOS 7 machine. Is > it still relevant? Yes, this bug still exists. However, I have just tested a fix: --- a/gnu/build/linux-container.scm +++ b/gnu/build/linux-container.scm @@ -44,7

bug#39955: wxmaxima: broken help menus

2020-12-02 Thread Kei Kebreau
This bug appears to have been fixed by the patches sent on July 31, pushed to master as commits e79fe4f675 and 93d9737d2b respectively. Thanks for reporting this, and please let us know if you continue to have issues with wxMaxima on Guix!

bug#44999: guix deploy Error reading from the channel

2020-12-02 Thread Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski
Hello Guixters, I am trying to deploy a system on DigitalOcean droplet using `guix deploy`. But I am facing the following issue : $ guix deploy ynm-machine-declaration.scm La (1) machine suivante sera déployée : ynm guix deploy: déploiement vers ynm... ;;; [2020/12/02

bug#44998: Thunar can't render vectorized icons under Wayland

2020-12-02 Thread guixuser6392 via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Thunar launched under Wayland falls back to the default adwaita icon theme when it fails to load vectorized icons. Steps to reproduce on Sway: $ guix install dconf glib:bin papirus-icon-theme thunar $ gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface icon-theme Papirus $ GDK_BACKEND=wayland thunar A

bug#25719: "guix package -i" exception should be a normal error message

2020-12-02 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi zimoun, On Tue, 01 Dec 2020 19:28:12 +0100 zimoun wrote: > This old bug #25719 is about exception and error message. See: > > > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 at 09:41, Danny Milosavljevic > wrote: > > When I have network problems sometimes I get a

bug#23874: [PATCH 2/2] profiles: Delete duplicate manifest entries in packages->manifest.

2020-12-02 Thread Leo Prikler
* gnu/profiles.scm (packages->manifest): Delete duplicate entries. --- guix/profiles.scm | 34 ++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/profiles.scm b/guix/profiles.scm index 99b7dbf299..14b98852bd 100644 --- a/guix/profiles.scm +++

bug#23874: [PATCH 1/2] profiles: Remove duplicates in manifest transactions.

2020-12-02 Thread Leo Prikler
* guix/profiles.scm (manifest-transaction-effects): Delete duplicates in install and remove. Let multiple upgrades and downgrades shadow previous transactions of the same kind. --- guix/profiles.scm | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/profiles.scm

bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 at 12:48, divoplade wrote: > Le mercredi 02 décembre 2020 à 12:11 +0100, zimoun a écrit : >> Said explicitly, if you do not want in your profile the package X >> belonging to %base-packages , do not add the %base-packages list. :-) >> Or >> create your custom list (remove the

bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest

2020-12-02 Thread divoplade
Le mercredi 02 décembre 2020 à 12:11 +0100, zimoun a écrit : > Said explicitly, if you do not want in your profile the package X > belonging to %base-packages , do not add the %base-packages list. :-) > Or > create your custom list (remove the ones you do not want). I do not > see > what could

bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest

2020-12-02 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 at 10:10, divoplade wrote: > Le mardi 01 décembre 2020 à 23:19 +0100, zimoun a écrit : >> Moreover, %base-packages already contains Guile (’guile-3.0-latest’), >> therefore I am not sure to understand what the bug is about >> specifically. > > That's the problem. I need

bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest

2020-12-02 Thread divoplade
Le mardi 01 décembre 2020 à 23:19 +0100, zimoun a écrit : > Moreover, %base-packages already contains Guile (’guile-3.0-latest’), > therefore I am not sure to understand what the bug is about > specifically. That's the problem. I need to remove it from %base-packages, otherwise the packages that

bug#23198: GNOME: Execution of "gkbd-keyboard-display" failed: Command not found

2020-12-02 Thread Leo Prikler
Hello Chris, Am Samstag, den 02.04.2016, 14:39 -0700 schrieb Chris Marusich: > Hi, > > I'm using GuixSD v0.10.0 with GNOME. In GNOME, when you have enabled > a > second keyboard input (via "Settings" > "Region and Language" > > "Input > Sources"), if you click on "Show Keyboard Layout" from the