Actually, here's how I use it:
https://framagit.org/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/systems/tachikoma.scm#L69
And the key file is the one generated by guix, unmodified:
https://framagit.org/tyreunom/system-configuration/-/blob/master/keys/xana.pub
Le 16 janvier 2021 19:34:49
I think you need to pass a file-like object, not a scheme expression. Don't try
to modify or interpret the public key file, just pass it directly as-is.
Le 16 janvier 2021 19:34:49 GMT-05:00, raingloom a écrit
:
>On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
>Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>> raingloom
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> raingloom writes:
>
> > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
> > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system".
> >
> > * that is not a valid field of operating-system
>
> That’s right. It’s a
Hi Stefan,
Stefan skribis:
> * gnu/services/virtualization.scm (qemu-binfmt-service-type)[guix-support?]:
> Change the default from #f to #t.
> * doc/guix.texi (Transparent Emulation with QEMU): Change the default of
> ‘guix-support?’ from #f to #t. Describe the implication of setting it to
Leo Famulari 写道：
If anyone is wondering why we didn't notice failures of packages
that
depend on rust, the canonical 'rust' packages is rust-1.45, but
these
failures seem to only affect later versions of rust.
Thanks. I am reverting the update on master for now.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 16.01.2021, 19:37 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hi,
>
> Leo Prikler skribis:
>
> > * gnu/services/cups.scm (%cups-accounts): Try to use the lp group
> > defined in
> > %base-groups.
> > * gnu/system/shadow.scm (account-activation): Delete duplicate
> > (eq?) users
> > and
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> When taking a look at the logs of failing builds of sbcl-* packages on
> aarch64-linux (for example at [1] for master or at [2] for staging),
> I saw that the build jobs try to build sbcl (which is currently failing)
> for
Hi,
Leo Prikler skribis:
> * gnu/services/cups.scm (%cups-accounts): Try to use the lp group defined in
> %base-groups.
> * gnu/system/shadow.scm (account-activation): Delete duplicate (eq?) users
> and groups before transforming them to specs and asserting, that names are
> unique.
[...]
>
Hi Ludo,
Can you share what other issues might arose after the fix?
I'd be happy to look into it.
Thanks!
Aleix
I'll leave it open then. Thanks for the patch, Chris.
Luis Felipe writes:
> On Saturday, January 16, 2021 11:18 AM, Christopher Baines
> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I've just pushed the fix I worked on for thumbnails [1].
>>
>> 1:
>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=540893a8ccef41436a1c00ae268f74219f9ab220
>>
>> Could you guix
On Saturday, January 16, 2021 11:18 AM, Christopher Baines
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've just pushed the fix I worked on for thumbnails [1].
>
> 1:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=540893a8ccef41436a1c00ae268f74219f9ab220
>
> Could you guix pull, guix upgrade gnome-font-viewer,
Luis Felipe via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
> ## Steps to reproduce
>
> The following steps assume you are using Guix System with GNOME desktop.
>
> 1. Open the command prompt (ALT+F2)
> 2. Run gnome-font-viewer
>
>
> ## Expected result
>
> GNOME Fonts starts and displays the fonts
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:03:47PM +0100, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
>> I tried to bootstrap sbcl using ecl instead of clisp, using
>> "guix build -s aarch64-linux sbcl" on a x86-64 machine because I don't
>> have any arm64 hardware, but it failed with the same memory
14 matches
Mail list logo
