Ludovic Courtès writes:
> For the record, I tried the attached patch in an attempt to sort things
> as discussed in the issue above, but it doesn’t have the intended
> effect. There must be other unsorted dictionaries elsewhere.
Hmm, I don't think dictionaries are a likely culprit here because
P
On 2021-10-21, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> For the last couple years guix has been applying simple workarounds in
> u-boot packages to disable the features that required openssl due to
> GPL/openssl license incompatibilities.
>
> I made an attempt at updating guix to u-boot 2021.10, which seems to
>
On 2021-10-22, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:17:03PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> While openssl 3.0 is licensed compatibly with GPLv3, u-boot has portions
>> which are GPLv2-only, so that's not as attractive of a way forward as
>> one might hope for...
>
> What are other di
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:17:03PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> While openssl 3.0 is licensed compatibly with GPLv3, u-boot has portions
> which are GPLv2-only, so that's not as attractive of a way forward as
> one might hope for...
What are other distros doing? Surely we can't be the only gr
> /gnu/store/5q75cw8lnw4kfg9nss5vwkx8pxakk96l-lilv-0.24.10/lib/liblilv-
0.so.
> 0: file too short
IIRC, someone send a bug report about "guix gc --verify=content/repair"
not interacting properly with content duplication. More precisely,
stuff in /gnu/store/.links wasn't checked for corruption. A
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> No, I’ve retitled it. Now looking at PeachPy:
>
> https://github.com/Maratyszcza/PeachPy/issues/88
For the record, I tried the attached patch in an attempt to sort things
as discussed in the issue above, but it doesn’t have the intended
effect. There must be o
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 20:57, jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
> https://git.sr.ht/~jgart/dotfiles/tree/master/item/bin/executable_guix-prepare-tree
--8<---cut here---start->8---
guix environment guix --container -- ./bootstrap \
&& gui
Hi Vagrant,
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 16:18, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> It has been rewritten to easily add new typo checks, but this one so far
> only addresses pluralized "This packages". Would be easy enough to add
> "allows to" but hard to add a suggested fix...
If I remember correctly the pre
