bug#55657: libgccjit is unusable

Am Samstag, dem 06.08.2022 um 05:37 + schrieb John Kehayias: > Hello, > > --- Original Message --- > On Friday, August 5th, 2022 at 5:31 PM, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > > > The style changes are not the only thing at play here, though. In > > particular, I am trying to build Emacs

bug#55657: libgccjit is unusable

Hello, --- Original Message --- On Friday, August 5th, 2022 at 5:31 PM, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > The style changes are not the only thing at play here, though. In > particular, I am trying to build Emacs 28.1, whereas Andrew builds > other versions, though notably the newest one oug

bug#52029: wterm fails to start on core-updates-frozen

This sounds like the right thing to do. Either of you feel like practicing a 'simple deprecation'? ;-) Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

bug#56398: (guix git) fails to check out repos with nested submodules

sex 05 ago 2022 às 17:10:50 (1659730250), nan...@riseup.net enviou: > Does it though? I'm trying to wrap my head over this, but I'm somewhat > unsure that this isn't the intended - expected? - behaviour on this > case: > (...) > So, I'm inclined to think that this is not a bug on libgit2, but a >

bug#55657: libgccjit is unusable

Am Freitag, dem 05.08.2022 um 20:01 + schrieb John Kehayias: > Hi, > > Looks like the code you sent got line wrapped and I couldn't easily > untangle it. The difference that pops out to me is how you are > locating the lib/gcc directory, is it maybe picking up from the build > system rather th

bug#56398: (guix git) fails to check out repos with nested submodules

qui 04 ago 2022 às 13:59:20 (1659632360), ludovic.cour...@inria.fr enviou: > But you got a wrong hash I presume, because submodule weren’t actually > checked out, right? The submodule was not checked out, sure, but is it the wrong hash considering it's also not present on the remote repo? > The p

bug#55657: libgccjit is unusable

Hi, Looks like the code you sent got line wrapped and I couldn't easily untangle it. The difference that pops out to me is how you are locating the lib/gcc directory, is it maybe picking up from the build system rather than libgccjit? (though I think gcc:lib should be the same here, but not gcc

bug#55657: libgccjit is unusable

Am Freitag, dem 05.08.2022 um 00:59 + schrieb Andrew Whatson: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 16:52, Liliana Marie Prikler > wrote > > But if I read your recipe correctly, you're not resolving %host- > > type in those options.  Does that really suffice? > > Ah, yes that is a little confusing.  This i

bug#56956: rust-pico-sys bundles PicoHTTPParser.

Thanks! Maxime. OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#56956: rust-pico-sys bundles PicoHTTPParser.

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 08:18:36PM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote: > X-Debbugs-CC: Efraim Flashner > > (^ original package author+committer) > > rust-pico-sys was added in commit > . > > This package bund

bug#56845: unclear error message: No route to host

Hi, Csepp skribis: > guix pull -v3 --cores=1 > guix pull: error: failed to load '/home/raingloom/.config/guix/channels.scm': > No route to host > ``` > > My channels.scm mentions at least 3 hosts by name and indirectly uses > ci.guix.gnu.org via channel-with-substitutes-available. ‘chann

bug#57005: PETSc is not reproducible

PETSc 3.16.1 is not reproducible as it captures the kernel version and number of processors of the machine it’s built on: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix describe Generation 223 Aug 01 2022 00:30:24(current) guix ab59155 repository URL: https://g

bug#48393: Can't build installer on aarch64 / v86d fails to build on aarch64

Pavel Shlyak writes: > This one is done with https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55806. I suggest closing it > as resolved. Indeed. With 55806, the uvesafb is added if (supported-package? v86d system), avoiding the need to check the system. I’m Closing by sending a mail to 48393-d...@debbugs.gnu.org.

bug#41120: uvesafb service is unsupported on aarch64

Pavel Shlyak writes: > This one is done with https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55806. I suggest closing it > as resolved. Indeed. With 55806, the uvesafb is added if (supported-package? v86d system), avoiding the need to check the system. I’m Closing by sending a mail to 41120-d...@debbugs.gnu.org.

bug#55587: bug#55596: Guix/Guile segfaults on `guix import texlive`

Hi, Ludovic Courtès skribis: > I don’t think so; the error message that was reported is: > > command "svn" "export" "--non-interactive" "--trust-server-cert" "-r" > "59745" > "svn://www.tug.org/texlive/tags/texlive-2021.3/Master/texmf-dist/doc/latex/cite/" > "/tmp/guix-directory.09UnsN/doc/

bug#52029: wterm fails to start on core-updates-frozen

On Fri Aug 5, 2022 at 2:37 AM BST, Joshua Branson via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > I vote that we remove wterm from guix. It is still unmaintained at the > github link below. And it doesn't ever run properly. Perhaps we could mark it as deprecated and point to Foot or WLTerm instead. -

bug#55549: Parted 3.5 update breaks installer tests

Hello! Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > This is caused by a regression in Parted 3.5 introduced by > 15c49ec04f7eaff014d2e1eddd0aecf4150db63d. > > The gpt_partition_set_system call can undo what's done by > gpt_partition_set_flag call. This imposes us to reverse the call order > and make sure that gp

bug#56437: Reduce closure size of gsettings-desktop-schemas

Maxime Devos writes: > On 07-07-2022 16:50, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Gsettings-desktop-schemas is required by WebKitGTK to load HTTPS pages. >> But it also depends on gnome-backgrounds which weights some 40 MiB. >> >> For sure this does not help the closure size... >> >> I suggest w

bug#56971: greeter user permissions are not enough to talk with seatd

Am Freitag, dem 05.08.2022 um 09:48 +0300 schrieb muradm: > > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 04.08.2022 um 15:52 +0300 schrieb muradm: > > > > > > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > > > > > > > [...] [L]ooking at the two patches, it appears they are to > > > > be used in

bug#55549: Parted 3.5 update breaks installer tests

Reported the problem upstream with: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56996. Mathieu

bug#55549: Parted 3.5 update breaks installer tests

Hey Ludo, > Mathieu, I’m guessing the cause of the problem, when using Parted 4.5, > is that the installer partitions disks somewhat incorrectly, as reported > by ‘grub-install’. I wonder if it might be due to an API or ABI change > that goes unnoticed in Guile-Parted because it uses the FFI.