bug#58859: profile contents depends on package order

2022-10-28 Thread John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi Guix, (I'm cc'ing the devel list for this bug report as I think some wider input and commentary would be worthwhile.) While investigating a bug with the --emulate-fhs option (bug report forthcoming) I noticed that the profile contents can depend on the order of packages given as input to

bug#58861: guix shell emulate-fhs option can have wrong glibc package

2022-10-28 Thread John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi Guixers, (cc'ing Ludo’ as author of the commit referenced below) After commit I noticed a changed in behavior of guix shell with the emulate-fhs option for a container. I tracked it down to the

bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

2022-10-28 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-10-26, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2022-10-26, zimoun wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 09:57, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> >>> It is consistently the same errors in the log, though on further looking >>> i discovered a branch in ~/.cache/guix/checkouts/ that had old removed >>> files in

bug#58841: Acknowledgement (repl ignores modules from the channel added to time-machine)

2022-10-28 Thread alexander barakin (aka sash-kan)
explanation: ## current configuration: $ guix describe --format=channels (list (channel (name 'guix) (url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git;) (branch "master") (commit "a0751e3250dfea7e52468c8090e18c3118d93a60") (introduction

bug#58841: repl ignores modules from the channel added to time-machine

2022-10-28 Thread alexander barakin (aka sash-kan)
see the attached file report.txt with explanations.## current configuration: $ guix describe --format=channels (list (channel (name 'guix) (url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git;) (branch "master") (commit

bug#47584: [PATCH 1/3] guile-next: Update to 3.0.8-793fb46.

2022-10-28 Thread Maxime Devos
* gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-next): Update to 3.0.8, commit 793fb46. [arguments]: Remove 'skip-failing-tests', as presumably the issues are fixed in the new version. --- gnu/packages/guile.scm | 21 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git

bug#47584: [PATCH 1/3] guile-next: Update to 3.0.8-793fb46.

2022-10-28 Thread Maxime Devos
On 28-10-2022 18:04, Maxime Devos wrote: (native-inputs - (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs guile-3.0) + (modify-inputs (package-native-inputs guile-3.0-latest) + (replace "guile" this-package) ; for cross-compilation I forgot to mention this in the commit

bug#47584: [PATCH 3/3] activation: Fix TOCTTOU in mkdir-p/perms.

2022-10-28 Thread Maxime Devos
I removed the 'Based upon mkdir-p from (guix build utils)' comment because it's quite a bit different now. * gnu/build/activation.scm (verify-not-symbolic): Delete. (mkdir-p/perms): Rewrite in terms of 'openat'. --- gnu/build/activation.scm | 90 +--- 1 file

bug#47584: [PATCH 2/3] WIP gnu: Change the Guile used for activation to one that has 'openat'.

2022-10-28 Thread Maxime Devos
TODO: when doing "make check-system TESTS=ldap", I get a build failure of openssl@1.1.1l, I suspect it's a situation like again, though I haven't investigated yet. Test Summary Report --- ../test/recipes/80-test_ssl_new.t(Wstat:

bug#47584: [DRAFT PATCH v2 0/4] Fix race condition in mkdir-p/perms

2022-10-28 Thread Maxime Devos
> TODO: change the Guile used for activation to some > commit that has openat etc, [...] This is done now, but "make check-system" now fails due to an openssl build failure, see latest patch, so not yet appliable ... OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key

bug#58221: (no subject)

2022-10-28 Thread Alexandre Hannud Abdo
Ni! I'm facing the same issue at 5dda4c69f075dcee020e51f4559cb3df4d2336c4 (Posting to follow thread).

bug#58836: pull failed on Debian bullseye

2022-10-28 Thread Kristian Nygaard Jensen
hint: Consider installing the `glibc-utf8-locales' or `glibc-locales' package and defining `GUIX_LOCPATH', along these lines: guix install glibc-utf8-locales export GUIX_LOCPATH="$HOME/.guix-profile/lib/locale" See the "Application Setup" section in the manual, for more info.

bug#58770: guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/9kyha1l1a1ynh9nni8428bqdanajck1b-compute-guix-derivation'

2022-10-28 Thread Mark Felt
I'm trying to build/use Guix as a package manager on top of the Linux distribution (container) provided by Chrome OS: https://chromeos.dev/en/linux All I do to get the error is: 1. install Guix from the distro's package manager 2. run 'guix pull' (which doesn't complete because of the

bug#58838: Bug report

2022-10-28 Thread EricR Rasmussen
~ $ guix pull Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at ' https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to d520fde (521 new commits)... Updating channel 'nonguix' from Git repository at ' https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix'... Authenticating

bug#28240: bad backtrace on “guix archive -x”

2022-10-28 Thread zimoun
Hi Ricardo, On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 13:30, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > zimoun writes: > >>> guix archive: error: corrupt input while restoring '/tmp/ci' from #>> file 0> >> >> The situation is still the same. Well, is the “guix archive” error the >> point of this bug report? > > The point is the

bug#25752: go incremental builds broken

2022-10-28 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 12:21, Maxime Devos wrote: > A reproducer was given in > : > > guix environment --ad-hoc go -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd > $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd > && rm -rf $t'

bug#58802: On guix pull: failed to compute the derivation for Guix (ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:)

2022-10-28 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 19:07, Wiktor Żelazny wrote: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > > Updating channel 'guix-wz' from Git repository at > 'file:///home/w/guix/guix-wz-git'... > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at >

bug#27515: Closing old bugs

2022-10-28 Thread Nicolas Graves via Bug reports for GNU Guix
This bug report is outdated as there is no package texlive-texmf-minimal anymore. -- Best regards, Nicolas Graves