bug#61106: spam

Fermé. Ceci n'est pas un bogue, mais une fonctionnalité. T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#59987: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph tests failing

Andrew Patterson 写道： I'm also in favor of closing. Done! You can close any bug yourself by editing the reply address in the CC header, as I did here. Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#59987: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph tests failing

I'm also in favor of closing. (I'm pretty sure I've garbage collected the closest generation to it, anyways). Thanks for the help! -- Andrew Patterson

bug#47106: bug#61101: Graphical container examples forget to expose things.

On 27-01-2023 18:34, Simon Tournier wrote: Hi, On ven., 27 janv. 2023 at 17:50, Maxime Devos wrote: Many of the graphical container examples don't work. I think it is related to #47097 [1]. 1: Right, didn't notice that one. That one appears to b

bug#61101: Graphical container examples forget to expose things.

Hi, On ven., 27 janv. 2023 at 17:50, Maxime Devos wrote: > Many of the graphical container examples don't work. I think it is related to #47097 [1]. 1: Cheers, simon

bug#46782: guix environment --expose options cannot be layered onto $PWD

Hi Maxim, A naive question since it works when using the --no-cwd option. On ven., 27 janv. 2023 at 11:19, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > guix environment -C --expose=/tmp=$PWD/tmp --ad-hoc bash coreutils \ > -- bash -c 'stat $PWD/

bug#61101: Graphical container examples forget to expose things.

Many of the graphical container examples don't work. For example, take guix shell --container --network --no-cwd ungoogled-chromium \ --preserve='^DISPLAY$' -- chromium from (guix)Invoking guix shell. It fails with: Authorization required, but no authorization protocol specified [

bug#61099: guix shell '-E' option can be silently ignored

Hello, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello, > > I just encountered a situation where -E is not correctly parsed/used and > ignore silently. > > Reproducer: > > guix shell -CD igraph -E /gnu=/gnu strace > > > The above doesn't work (there are far too few entries to /gnu/store, it > isn't shared). > >

bug#61099: guix shell '-E' option can be silently ignored

Hello, I just encountered a situation where -E is not correctly parsed/used and ignore silently. Reproducer: --8<---cut here---start->8--- guix shell -CD igraph -E /gnu=/gnu strace --8<---cut here---end--->8--- The above do

bug#46782: guix environment --expose options cannot be layered onto $PWD

Hi, bbb ee writes: > There is a similar issue that is solved: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59425 I can still reproduce the original problem with: --8<---cut here---start->8--- guix environment -C --expose=/tmp=$PWD/tmp --ad-hoc bash coreutils \ -- bash -c 's

bug#57479: bug#60975: [PATCH] gnu: inkscape: Fix qrcode rendering.

Hi, Michael Rohleder skribis: > Fixes . > > * gnu/packages/inkscape.scm (inkscape)[inputs]: Add python-cssselect. Applied, thanks! Ludo’.

bug#59987: Guix build of guix package fails due to some graph tests failing

Hi, On jeu., 26 janv. 2023 at 16:38, Andrew Patterson wrote: >> Are you running plain “make check” or do you pass an argument as >> “make >> check -j 123”? > > The build error was from `guix build guix`, so make check was > running with whatever that calls it with. In case it's relevant, > t