bug#61646: Bandwidth-induced offload timeout abort whole operating

Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] > Weird. Since the it’s a timeout while connecting, I suppose the patch > below would improve the situation: > > diff --git a/guix/scripts/offload.scm b/guix/scripts/offload.scm > index 578b3b9888..90cf97401c 100644 > --- a/guix/scripts/offload.scm > +++ b/

bug#61646: Bandwidth-induced offload timeout abort whole operating

Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> I can reproduce this rather easily on my system: >> >> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build icedove >> The following derivations will be built: >> /gnu/store/l6r93asndd0kwv7024iyrl71zd0lbpbq-icedove-102.7.2.drv >> /gnu

bug#61557: vdirsyncer fails to verify certificates

reassign 61557 guix thanks Hi, I had missed the Package: pseudo-header because I shouldn't be alive at this point. All Guix bugs should be filed against the ‘guix’ package, no matter what the package—confusing, I know. Luckily, sending mail to bug-guix@ does this for you, so you don't usua

bug#60589: guix build --keep-going (-k) not always honored

I can confirm this bug. ``` $ guix describe guix ea2fa86 Repository-URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git Branch: master Commit: ea2fa86f31a83195ac789a6d92bcaee8e53e4397 ``` My example involves a bit more packages. Those who got back by `guix refresh --list-dependent icu4c

bug#61760: Podman contains vendored code

Hi Guix, I was dealing with issue #61682 earlier, when Am Freitag, dem 24.02.2023 um 06:20 +0100 schrieb Liliana Marie Prikler: > As fun as it sounds to build Go stuff with just a Makefile, you have > a lot of vendored code unaccounted for. Am Freitag, dem 24.02.2023 um 07:12 + schrieb Zong

bug#61684: can't compose 'with-patch' with 'with-source'

Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> Given 'with-source' discards any patch from the original source, I thought >> I could at least add them back via 'with-patch', but it appears this >> does not work: >> >> scheme@(gnu packages jami)> (options->tran

bug#61684: can't compose 'with-patch' with 'with-source'

Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi Maxim, > > On ven., 24 févr. 2023 at 08:21, Maxim Cournoyer > wrote: > >>> Well, I am not convinced that enforce the ordering is a good thing >>> because as Ludo said, some HPC user exploits this control of ordering to >>> generate complex transformations.

bug#61684: can't compose 'with-patch' with 'with-source'

Hi Maxim, On ven., 24 févr. 2023 at 08:21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> Well, I am not convinced that enforce the ordering is a good thing >> because as Ludo said, some HPC user exploits this control of ordering to >> generate complex transformations. > > Could we gather more information about tha

bug#61722: [PATCH v2] cpio: Properly handle Unicode characters in file names.

Fixes . * guix/cpio.scm (file->cpio-header): Compute the file name length in bytes rather than in characters. (file->cpio-header*, special-file->cpio-header*): Likewise. (write-cpio-archive): Likewise, and write the file name as UTF-8 bytes, not textually, to av

bug#61684: can't compose 'with-patch' with 'with-source'

Hello, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On jeu., 23 févr. 2023 at 17:27, Maxim Cournoyer > wrote: > >> Hm. That seems sub-optimal; it seems to me that ideally, the >> transformations would be additive, so that users would not need to care >> about the ordering. Or perhaps, alternatively, we

bug#61717: guix home reconfigure on a fresh system fails

On 2023-02-22 16:40, w...@wolfsden.cz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to setup a Guix machine. I did clean install using guix system > init, > I can provide the config, but it does not seem to be relevant. After that I > decided to try the guix home reconfigure command, and it ended with: > > gui

bug#61555: Failed install : installer-dump-8deefb3d

Dear Ludo’, Thank you for your response and walking me through the log file I can confirm my homer-simpson-style error as being not using the 64bit OS.. The system is installed and the install process was a very different and enjoyable experience :) Thank you . Paul. > On 24 Feb 2023, at 11

bug#61684: can't compose 'with-patch' with 'with-source'

Hi, On jeu., 23 févr. 2023 at 17:27, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hm. That seems sub-optimal; it seems to me that ideally, the > transformations would be additive, so that users would not need to care > about the ordering. Or perhaps, alternatively, we could enforce such > ordering at the impleme

bug#61722: [PATCH] cpio: Properly handle Unicode characters in file names.

Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Fixes . > > * guix/cpio.scm (file->cpio-header): Compute the file name length in bytes > rather than in > characters. > (file->cpio-header*, special-file->cpio-header*): Likewise. > (write-cpio-archive): Likewise, and write

bug#61201: Installation hint crashes when user names contain at sign

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ludovic Courtès skribis: > >> A funny thing was reported earlier today on the Café Guix channel: >> >> $ guix install hello [17:52] >> building profile with 5 packages... >> hint: Backtrace: > > [...] > >> In guix/ui.scm: >> 312:5 6 (display-hint _ ) >> 1451:2

bug#61554: guix refresh update missing option for no-offload

Hi Greg, Greg Hogan skribis: > `guix refresh --update ` attempts to compute the file hash on > an offload machine, but provides no option to disable the offload as > with `guix build --no-offload `. Could you share an example session showing the problem? ‘guix refresh -u’ is not supposed to bu

bug#61555: Failed install : installer-dump-8deefb3d

Hi Paul, "Paul Connelly (Student)" skribis: > Just trying to install Guix as a standalone OS , core i5 4460, on SSD, > graphics intel 460. I have submitted installer-dump-8deefb3d. I hope it > helps. It’s perfect, thank you for reporting the problem. The system log in that dump shows that ‘

bug#61201: Installation hint crashes when user names contain at sign

Ludovic Courtès skribis: > A funny thing was reported earlier today on the Café Guix channel: > > $ guix install hello [17:52] > building profile with 5 packages... > hint: Backtrace: [...] > In guix/ui.scm: > 312:5 6 (display-hint _ ) > 1451:24 5 (texi->plain-text ) > In texinfo.scm: