On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 07:31:47PM +0200, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Maybe I am doing something wrong, I get:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> $ guix refresh -l gnupg | cut -f1 -d':'
> Building the following 1491 packages would ensure 2880 dependent packages are
Hi team Guix!
I was working on packaging taffybar (https://github.com/taffybar/taffybar),
which depends on haskell-gi (https://github.com/haskell-gi/haskell-gi) -
haskell bindings for goject-introspection capable libraries. While packaging
gi-gdk, I hit this error:
--8<---cut here-
Building ddcci-driver-linuxf 0.4.2 no longer works which means I can't update
my system :(.
The build status also shows that since January 8, (ID:325553 8 Jan 04:21)
ddcci-driver-linux no longer builds.
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=ddcci-driver-linux%200.4.2%20spec:master&border-high-i
Hi Leo,
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 at 12:23, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> Well, graft does not seem recommended because it would update to two
>> versions. And update the package would be a core-updates.
>>
>> Well, maybe it could be of the current core-updates dance. Could you
>> send a patch for core-up
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:01:33AM -0400, Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU
Guix wrote:
> However, the bug referenced here is fixed in upstream commit
> 4cc724639c012215f59648cbb4b7631b9d352e36, which shipped in gnupg
> 2.2.34. Meanwhile, all gnupg releases older than 2.2.35 suffer from
> an
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:48:31AM +0200, Simon Tournier wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 09:01, Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> wrote:
> > I believe the pin on 2.2.32 can be lifted, but as gnupg is important
> > infrastructure I am unsure about directly submitting a patch to update
>
Yes, rust-next works, but I was imagining renaming the current rust to
something like default-rust-build, then defining a new ‘rust’ which will be
continuously updated to the latest version of rust.
I think a user centric design would name the latest rust as just ‘rust’, while
letting the packa
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 21:11, paren--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
> There's another important reason:
>
> rust != rust-1.60
Well, as discussed in [1]
[bug#62643] [PATCH] gnu: rust-1.65: Rename package to rust-next.
this report #62064 is not a bug but instead a wish list: u
Hi,
Cool you did this test! :-)
On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 at 23:39, Nicolas Graves via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
> Here is the content + backtrace of the time-machine call, after the ~10
> hours long object processing on Software Heritage side:
Last time I checked that, I never got the object
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 10:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I was thinking a second time about it and found that not only the newer
>> development of OpenJDK is on GitHub, but also the older versions are
>> available. So I could add another patch like this:
>>
>> + (method git-fetc
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 09:01, Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
> I believe the pin on 2.2.32 can be lifted, but as gnupg is important
> infrastructure I am unsure about directly submitting a patch to update
> to a newer version.
Well, graft does not seem recommended because
11 matches
Mail list logo
