On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 11:05 +0200, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> Was this using the 1.4 installer or the latest one? If it was the
> former, can you please try with latest?
Done. Same error.
The dump was uploaded as installer-dump-fe2a1bdb. Please report it by
email to bug-guix@gnu.org.
With regards to the invisible LUKs prompt; my laptop does not run libreboot,
but is still affected. Seems more like the Thinkpad framebuffer driver has a
bug on the Linux or Grub side to me.
I can reproduce this on kernels 6.1.58, 6.5.7. Rolling back to a generation
with kernel 6.1.57 fixes it, though, this is a correlation and I do not know if
the kernel necessarily is what caused it.
As far as I know, the double prompt is expected behaviour (65002 seems to have
a fix for that),
Change-Id: Iebe76c75d45e70317bd18d2c176dcdeaf9d6964c
Signed-off-by: Maciej Kalandyk
---
guix/scripts/locate.scm | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/locate.scm b/guix/scripts/locate.scm
index 93faa1aea2..a6b6036052 100644
---
Hi,
(Cc: Maxim.)
Simon Tournier skribis:
> $ guix time-machine -q --commit=6113e05 -- describe
> receiving objects 2% ▕█▋
> …some time flies…
> indexing objects 21% ▕███
>▏
>
Hi Maya,
Maya Tomasek skribis:
> The problem is as per official OpenBLAS docs
> (https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/blob/c3f2a3c0ca8d4a3700f81f176dd3f1bc08cff3dd/docs/distributing.md?plain=1#L79)
> that some applications expect a `libopenblas64_.so` name, but Guix
> chooses it's custom
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> 2. All the ongoing and about-to-be-started builds carried out by
> worker processes at that point were marked as failed.
This part of the problem was a bit more subtle.q
When ‘cuirass remote-server’ goes away, ‘cuirass remote-worker’ keeps
going if it was
Hi Caleb,
Caleb Herbert writes:
> The dump was uploaded as installer-dump-c4fd6109. Please report it by
> email to bug-guix@gnu.org.
Was this using the 1.4 installer or the latest one? If it was the
former, can you please try with latest? I can spot a "write_wait_fd:
unimplemented"
