On the OverDrive (AArch64), ‘cuirass remote-worker’ (1.2.0-1.bdc1f9f) says:
starting 2 workers (parallelism: 1 cores) for server at 10.0.0.1
Instead it should use two cores for each worker:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
ludo@dover ~$ guile -c '(use-modules (
2023-11-28 01:58 maximede...@telenet.be:
[[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
Op 23-11-2023 om 15:17 schreef Mekeor Melire:
>> >> Bug 2: no collision handling.
> As far as I know, Guix does not provide a facility to
> prioritize a
> file from one package over the same file from another package.
As
2023-11-28 02:47 maximede...@telenet.be:
Op 22-11-2023 om 21:53 schreef Simon Tournier:
> On mar., 21 nov. 2023 at 19:01, Maxime Devos
> wrote:
For widget and woman, sure, I'll take your word for it is fully
merged
in Emacs (both the literal code & development (& maintenance)).
But
I'm talk
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 02:47, Maxime Devos wrote:
>> Once builtin, the code of a package distributed with GNU Emacs is
>> maintained by Emacs maintainers and fully part of GNU Emacs.
>
> Yes, and? How does being fully part of GNU Emacs and being maintained
> by Emacs maintainers make it any les
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> ludo@dover ~$ sudo herd status cuirass-remote-worker
> Status of cuirass-remote-worker:
> It is started.
> Running value is 21279.
> It is enabled.
> Provides (cuirass-remote-worker).
> Requires (avahi-daemon guix-daemon networking).
> Will be respawned.
> l
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 11:19, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> As in:
>
> (open-connection
> #:assume-available-builtin-builders '("download"))
Instead, why not check in ’git-fetch’? Currently, the test is done
against the local daemon, right?
--8<---cut here---start
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 15:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Maxim, should we explicitly recommend ‘rpm -i’ in the manual?
I propose something like:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
doc/guix.texi | 8
modified doc/guix.t
This issue seems to have been fixed by Tobias with commit
22642d460488896ec1ddb25d7eb262938db810eb
using a patch to work around the issue. I created a patch that'd
upgrade to the next version where igt-gpu-tools is actually fixed (so
the patch is not needed anymore): https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Christopher Baines skribis:
>
>> The bordeaux build farm depends on computing the derivations on one
>> machine, then potentially building them on a different machine.
>>
>> Some of the build machines don't have a new enough guix-daemon that
>> understands buil
