Hello,
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix refresh asio
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 16 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In unknown file:
15 (apply-smob/0 #)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
724:2 14 (call-with-prompt _ _ #)
In ice-9
Hello,
cuir...@gnu.org (Cuirass) writes:
> The build libstdc++-boot0.x86_64-linux for specification
> core-updates is broken. You can find the detailed information about
> this build href="https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3012286/details";>here.
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/3012286/details
Hi,
Josselin Poiret writes:
> Hi Artyom,
>
> "Artyom V. Poptsov" writes:
>
>> Initialized empty Git repository in
>> /gnu/store/dpbxqzqmbhfy7jc2a9dyfi28fdvi04sd-guile-gnutls-3.7.11-checkout/.git/
>> fatal: unable to access 'https://gitlab.com/gnutls/guile/': The requested
>> URL returned err
Hi Vivien,
Vivien Kraus writes:
> * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls): Skip the doc/examples subdir on mingw,
> because the gnulib modules are not correct.
> ---
> gnu/packages/tls.scm | 9 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/tls.scm b/gnu/packages/tls.scm
> in
Hi!
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> Evaluating user expression (catch #t (lambda () (load "/gnu/store/64?")) # ?).
> starting
> '/gnu/store/gn8q7p790a9zdnlciyp1vlncpin366r0-hurd-v0.9.git20230216/hurd/pfinet
> "--ipv6" "/servers/socket/26" "--interface" "/dev/eth0" "--address"
> "10.0.2.15" "--netm
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> Patch at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68241
If you want to test it without rebuilding tons of packages, here is a
version that grafts a patched Python onto the existing ones (as substitutes):
https://codeberg.org/khinsen/guix/src/branch/graft-fix-python-sitecustomize
Che
One thing I deeply appreciate about Gnu Guix is the fact that I have assurance
that I have installed and am using software that respects my fundamental
software freedoms. My understanding based on Guix's packaging guidelines
(https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Packaging-Guidelines.html) is
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 03:32:55PM +, Steven Roose wrote:
> I've been using alacritty as my default terminal for about a year without
> much issues. I'm currently on v0.12.3 of alacritty and use it with i3 and
> Xorg. A month or two ago I noticed that upgrading GuixSD broke alacritty.
> Since i