pull'.
I'm hard at work with Next 2.0 and it should fix some long standing
issues that are still in Next 1.5.0.
Thanks for swift response and reaction. I can confirm that new pull
fixes the issue for me.
Stay tuned!
I will, good luck with 2.0!
Best regards,
Tomáš Čech
PS: I used bug-tracker
it.
It seems that I have the same issue as can be seen here:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/91snb4sd5c6xrp930s3v5a5yrxfr0n3h-next-1.5.0
Thanks in advance,
Tomáš Čech
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 09:34:34PM +0200, Jelle Licht wrote:
Hi S_W, Maxim
Tomáš Čech writes:
Hi Ludo,
[...]
But with Maxim's DBus related patches and my NM patch it seemed to be
starting daemons at least.
Do you still have the patches for these changes lying around? I am
trying
Hi Ludo,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:19:20PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Tomáš,
Tomáš Čech skribis:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:51:07AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
[...]
To be continued...
You seem to be on very right track. There is another unexpect problem
- NetworkManager
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:51:07AM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Debugging a bit further, it seems that my change to the
network-manager-service-type had the following effect:
A file populated at /etc/dbus-1/system-local.conf now has an include
directive for network-manager-openvpn:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:38:18PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech <sleep_wal...@gnu.org> skribis:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
829:9 1 (catch system-error # …)
In gnu/system/linux-initrd.scm:
361:6 0 (_)
gnu/system/linux-initrd.scm:361:6: known-module-aliases: unbound variabl
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:19:52AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
[huge build]
The current tradeoff is to make that diagnostic based on the running
kernel, even if it’s an approximation.
Ah, good point.
If that’s fine with you I’d like
`guix system init` seems to be broken for non GuixSD distirbutions:
When I tried it on openSUSE:
# guix system --no-bootloader init /Devel/git/guix-config/config.scm /mnt/mnt/
;;; note: source file /Devel/extra/gnu/packages/connman.scm
;;; newer than compiled
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 03:08:59AM +, Adam Bolte wrote:
Hi there,
I'm running Guix 0.10.0 on a Debian stretch box, and I'd like to
upgrade. The box had not been booted for quite some time, hence the
version is somewhat old.
Running `guix pull`, I get the following:
Starting download of
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:31:12AM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Hello,
So how does the ‘menu-entry’ example that Tomáš gave translate with this
new API? (Apologies for asking, I admit I haven’t fully adjusted to the
new API mentally. :-))
Well it's still moving :)
We can ask him but I
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 10:31:59PM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Hi Tomáš,
My question without answer is - how can I specify bootloader menu entries now?
You're right, you have to pass a now. The
documentation patch is still in review, you can find it here :
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 10:52:34PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
Hi,
there's a doc patch in review by Mathieu (16 May 2017 15:03 +0200, "doc: Adapt to
multiple bootloader support", bug# 26339) in guix-patches.
As I have seen this feature on ML some time ago already, I didn't
expect to be
I'm running from GIT with HEAD on 12eecbf0bb798f99454a46c191bb0ec6bdef1aa5.
It seems that menu-entry is still described in documentation
doc/guix.texi:15337
but code seems to abandon the use already in favor of boot-parameters
at least to my level of understanding.
My question without answer
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:51:18PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Leo Famulari <l...@f
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Leo Famulari skribis:
> In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
> pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 09:25:11AM +, Pjotr Prins wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 08:56:41AM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
And IMHO the best and also "Guix way" could be making guix-daemon aware of
possible newer versions in /gnu/store and execing them instead...
Giving a loud warn
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:29:41PM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:11:56PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
> pull) [0] exposed a sort o
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:11:56PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of
users who were still using the guix-daemon from 0.10.0.
It seems unlikely that they have
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:25:32 +0100,
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Hi Tomáš,
>
> Any updates on this bug, or should we close it?
I haven't met this bug since. Let's close it.
Thanks.
S_W
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:20:11 +0100,
Gennadii Kondratiev wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [2 ]
> #Hello!
> #
> #Thanks for your kind words and encouragement!
> #
> #As far as GRUB is concerned, please email 25...@debbugs.gnu.org detailed
> #information about what you expected and what you get (wrong behavior,
mount command from util-linux is expecting helpers in /sbin/
directory, which is not available on GuixSD.
If found it when I tried to mount manully NFS:
# mount -t nfs server:/some/path /mnt
Manual page of `mount' - section EXTERNAL HELPERS and strace seems to agree:
...
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:03:38AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Good news!
Good news indeed!
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
Tomáš Čech <sleep_wal...@suse.cz> skribis:
Grub configuration interpretes `linux' as directory where is located
bzImage. If I enter file name i
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 06:56:19PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello!
Tomáš Čech <sleep_wal...@gnu.org> skribis:
It seems to be easy to crash useradd (from shadow package).
Is it on GuixSD?
Yes. \o/
from strace:
read(3, "account required pam_deny.so \nau"..., 4096)
* gnu/packages/documentation.scm(asciidoc): New input docbook-xsl,
replace use of online source and prefer docbook-xsl package.
---
gnu/packages/documentation.scm | 18 --
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/documentation.scm
I'm trying to create package for sway and I noticed strange behavior
difference between build by daemon and by me within prepared
environment.
I found the reason for that - a2x (asciidoc) is trying to access
manpage/docbook.xsl.
asciidoc package needs to be adjusted to use docbook-xsl package
It seems to be easy to crash useradd (from shadow package).
# ls -l $(which useradd)
lrwxrwxrwx 4 root guixbuild 69 Jan 1 1970 /root/.guix-profile/sbin/useradd ->
/gnu/store/ylnc73apl1irl0s613rxjl445x2zx8a5-shadow-4.2.1/sbin/useradd
# useradd test
Neoprávněný přístup do paměti (SIGSEGV)
I installed `password-store' and simple invocation failed:
$ LC_ALL=C pass
Password Store
/home/tcech/.guix-profile/bin/pass: line 324: tree: command not found
After manually installing `tree' package it works as expected.
A `pass' is bash script, shouldn't be inputs be changed to
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 11:05:34PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech sleep_wal...@gnu.org skribis:
I'm afraid I can reproduce it.
It’s a different problem this time. :-)
--%my-config.scmbegin%---
[...]
(packages
(append
I'm afraid I can reproduce it.
I'm at revision bfe3c6857251c1fff24317da602b9cd762c1c112, running guix from
GIT through pre-inst-env.
I was able to remove all my local modifications so no GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH is in
place.
--%my-config.scmbegin%---
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:13:13AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech tc...@suse.cz skribis:
Perhaps we can eventually move to an actual tree structure where the
nodes can be named whatever. Until now I thought that's how generations
work, and are just named after integers
Sorry, for some reason I didn't get any e-mail and noticed only
closing the bug. I'll subscribe to bug-guix ML to prevent it.
That’s expected, yes. What makes you think it’s a problem?
First, it was conflicting experience with what you were saying on IRC.
User experience was a bit confusing
Generation number is not always the maximum of all generation numbers
and so generation number is not always monotonic.
Steps to reproduce:
Lets start with on generation N.
1] install some package (you'll have N and N+1)
2] install some other package (you'll have N, N+1 and N+2)
3] delete
I have almost forgot about this bug so lets track it.
Calling curl from shell causes error message:
$ curl http://www.google.com
curl: (4) A requested feature, protocol or option was not found built-in in
this libcurl due to a build-time decision.
You'll get this answer on any protocol I
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:30:55AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech sleep_wal...@suse.cz skribis:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:32:30PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 04:02:11PM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
I'm trying to create package for taskwarrior.
Source tarball
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:54:53AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech sleep_wal...@suse.cz skribis:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:58:07AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech sleep_wal...@suse.cz skribis:
[...]
Shouldn't `grub' be in `%base-packages'?
It could be there; OTOH, we
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:35:42AM +0100, Tomas Cech wrote:
At Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:04:23 +0100,
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomas Cech sleep_wal...@suse.cz skribis:
I tried to install Guix as alternative OS to my Gentoo and openSUSE
installations to give a try. I tried unsupported scenario -
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:09:13PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
tc...@suse.cz skribis:
After booting into Guix I used slim to login into Ratpoison and I run
there terminal emulator. `guix' wasn't available in current PATH
settings so user couldn't maintain his profile.
I believe that
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:58:07AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Tomáš Čech sleep_wal...@suse.cz skribis:
TL;DR
I run `guix system init' from Gentoo to separate partition to
_init_ root filesystem and after reboot to boot into GuixSD.
OK, that’s not what I had understood, so thanks
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 10:49:37PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
tc...@suse.cz skribis:
With guix at revision df81e046c57e5f767738113e4e7a28b212c03d63 I tried
to deploy Guix to another partition.
Do you mean that you wanted to use a different root partition than the
one that was being used?
39 matches
Mail list logo