bug#38782: portaudio fails to build

2019-12-29 Thread brettg
On 29.12.2019 10:43, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Hello, bre...@posteo.net writes: I would personally comment the reason for disabling parallel builds You mean as a comment in the package definition? I checked other definitions, comments in this situation, if any, are terse. E.g., ";fails on so

bug#38782: portaudio fails to build

2019-12-29 Thread brettg
On 29.12.2019 09:59, Sergiu Marton wrote: Would the following patch fix the issue then? That fixes it without requiring extra CLI arguments. Nice, thanks. On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 8:44 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Hello, Sergiu Marton writes: >> I have been able to build it locally. I s

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-19 Thread brettg
On 19.11.2019 22:29, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: bre...@posteo.net writes: [...] Thank you for your work Maxim, I think most of them are resolved now. I do wonder about what prompted the change, though. Perhaps you might share? Brett The main motivation was to gain the ability to install Emac

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-19 Thread brettg
On 19.11.2019 22:14, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: Hello Brett, Thank you for the heads-up concerning the latest changes to the way Emacs find its libraries and the adjustments done to the emacs-build-system. bre...@posteo.net writes: On 19.11.2019 01:32, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 19.11.2019 0

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-18 Thread brettg
On 19.11.2019 01:32, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 19.11.2019 01:27, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 22:34, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 21:33, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 21:28, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 20:01, bre...@posteo.net wrote: Hey all, the r

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-18 Thread brettg
On 19.11.2019 01:27, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 22:34, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 21:33, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 21:28, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 20:01, bre...@posteo.net wrote: Hey all, the recent changes to the emacs build system result

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-18 Thread brettg
On 18.11.2019 22:34, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 21:33, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 21:28, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 20:01, bre...@posteo.net wrote: Hey all, the recent changes to the emacs build system result in a few broken packages like emacs-pdf-tools,

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-18 Thread brettg
On 18.11.2019 21:33, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 21:28, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 20:01, bre...@posteo.net wrote: Hey all, the recent changes to the emacs build system result in a few broken packages like emacs-pdf-tools, or basically anything that uses a phase for em

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-18 Thread brettg
On 18.11.2019 21:28, bre...@posteo.net wrote: On 18.11.2019 20:01, bre...@posteo.net wrote: Hey all, the recent changes to the emacs build system result in a few broken packages like emacs-pdf-tools, or basically anything that uses a phase for emacs-set-emacs-load-path. For example, I borrow

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-18 Thread brettg
On 18.11.2019 20:01, bre...@posteo.net wrote: Hey all, the recent changes to the emacs build system result in a few broken packages like emacs-pdf-tools, or basically anything that uses a phase for emacs-set-emacs-load-path. For example, I borrowed the technique used by emacs-pdf-tools to pac

bug#38261: Recent changes to emacs build system

2019-11-18 Thread brettg
Hey all, the recent changes to the emacs build system result in a few broken packages like emacs-pdf-tools, or basically anything that uses a phase for emacs-set-emacs-load-path. For example, I borrowed the technique used by emacs-pdf-tools to package emacs-telega, resulting in both packages f

bug#35484: GDM failing to start stumpwm after merge

2019-04-29 Thread brettg
On 29.04.2019 18:05, Timothy Sample wrote: Hi again, Timothy Sample writes: Hi Brett, Brett Gilio writes: Hey all I just reconfigured my system configuration after the big staging merge to master. I use StumpWM. GDM seems to be starting just fine, but after this reconfiguration stu

bug#35242: Backtrace on building with load path

2019-04-12 Thread brettg
Hi T G-R, Unless I am doing this incorrectly, it doesn't change the output. brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ export COLUMNS brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L . Backtrace: In guix/store.scm: 613:10 19 (call-with-store #guix/scripts/build.scm:889:8…&

bug#35242: Backtrace on building with load path

2019-04-11 Thread brettg
Hi all. I am trying to build custom packages, and today a regression may have been introduced either on guix-master or in my own channel. I am trying to find out where the issue lies. brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L . Backtrace: In guix/store.scm: 613:10 19

bug#34772: Python tkinter

2019-03-07 Thread brettg
On 08.03.2019 02:02, Timothy Sample wrote: Hi Brett, "bre...@posteo.net" writes: Bumping this, as it has been 24 hours without a reply. I'm still not sure what to make of this issue, and I do not have another machine to reproduce it on. [...] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named '_tkinte

bug#34772: Python tkinter

2019-03-06 Thread brettg
Hello all, I am having an issue getting tkinter to work for our python build. brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/CS101/Prog4$ python3 main.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "main.py", line 50, in import windowUtilMod File "/home/brettg/Repos/CS101/Prog4/windowUtilMod.

bug#33235: Bzip hash error

2018-11-02 Thread brettg
: Hi brettg, I tried with a fresh guixsd 0.15 install and can confirm your problem: On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 04:33:10 +0100 bre...@posteo.net wrote: Hi Leo, Are you perhaps mistaken? the URL for bzip2 is bzip.org not bzip2.org Regardless, even when pulling from the archive I am still being given an

bug#33235: Bzip hash error

2018-11-01 Thread brettg
Hi Leo, Are you perhaps mistaken? the URL for bzip2 is bzip.org not bzip2.org Regardless, even when pulling from the archive I am still being given an incorrect hash. On 02.11.2018 04:09, Leo Famulari wrote: On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:29:50AM +0100, bre...@posteo.net wrote: Hi Leo, I’m com

bug#33235: Bzip hash error

2018-11-01 Thread brettg
The sha256 has for bzip2 is mismatching on build.