bug#35139: Rust builds systematically time out

When I try to install rust I get similar behavior. It does not finish building. The longest I have let it try for was around 12 hours. That was is a on a machine with 1GB RAM and 10GB SWAP. Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello, > > On berlin, Rust 1.24.1 builds systematically exceed the timeout: > >

bug#35114: Error building installation ISO

I am trying to build an installation ISO so I can test the graphical installer. I am building an installation ISO on a x86_64 Guix System for a i686 machine. `git describe` v0.16.0-4215-g1aa662b309 I get an error when I run this command: `guix system disk-image --file-system-type=iso9660 -s i68

bug#34938: `make check-system` test suite failed

Ludovic Courtès writes: > ... > > This is likely the same issue as the one you reported in > . > > Could you try again? > > ... I have rerun `make check-system -j3` as a non root user and it looks like the same results. There two failed tests and it is stil

bug#35047: "Running the Test Suite" root user

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > mikadoZero, > > mikadoZero wrote: >> Looking at "2.3 Running the Test Suite" of the manual it does not >> mention that tests should be run as a non root user. > > I guess this is one of those (Unix-)cultural knowledge thin

bug#35047: "Running the Test Suite" root user

Looking at "2.3 Running the Test Suite" of the manual it does not mention that tests should be run as a non root user. The test `tests/pack` fails when `make check` is run as a root user. It does not fail when run as a non root user. I found this example by running `make check TESTS="tests/pack.

bug#34945: Guix repository `make check` failing tests

# PASS: 4 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 mikadoZero writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hi, >> >> mikadoZero skribis: >> >>> @ build-started >>

bug#34945: Guix repository `make check` failing tests

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > mikadoZero skribis: > >> @ build-started >> /home/guix/u/guix/failedTests/guix/test-tmp/store/mps9fhh4frs84izvwl1pyl8hvyq593is-guile-2.0.9.tar.xz.drv >> - x86_64-linux >> /home/guix/u/guix/failedTest

bug#34829: [PATCH] gnu: usbutils: Make package description different from synopsis.

guix build --system=aarch64-linux --rounds=4 usbutils >From 00a6add2736d3695b16f0c40177751852fbc6a67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mikadoZero Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 20:49:05 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: usbutils: Make package description different from synopsis. * gnu/packages/linux.

bug#34828: [PATCH] bug#34828 gnu: psmisc: Make package description more informative

00:00:00 2001 From: mikadoZero Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:23:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: psmisc: Make package description more informative. * gnu/packages/linux.scm (psmisc): The content for the description is taken from the psmisc readme. --- gnu/packages/linux.scm | 19 ---

bug#34938: `make check-system` test suite failed

I get two failing test and an error when running `make check-system`. `guix describe` guix 6e42cef repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 6e42cef0abdce00629294794ba06fe75e161ffb4 In the guix repository `git describe` outputs: v0.16.0-3757-gf1a

bug#34897: System reconfigure error

This was not a bug. It looked like a bug to me before I received the helpful replies.

bug#34897: System reconfigure error

Ludovic Courtès writes: > ... > > The name that “guix package -s” shows is the package name. > ‘gnu-gettext’, conversely, is the name of the variable bound to that > package. > > In your config file, you can use ‘specifications->manifest’ as > documented in the manual if you’d rather avoid deal

bug#34897: System reconfigure error

Danny Milosavljevic writes: > The gettext package is named "gnu-gettext". Modify your "packages" field. Thank you. Changing "gettext" to "gnu-gettext" got it working. In this case package search seems to be misleading. `guix package -s gnu-gettext` returns nothing. While in the return of `

bug#34897: System reconfigure error

Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 04:11:49PM -0400, mikadoZero wrote: >> `guix describe` >> guix 19c0cdb >> repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git >> branch: master >> commit: 19c0cdb9e6271956015232421ef7f63a1ad001ae &

bug#34897: System reconfigure error

`guix describe` guix 19c0cdb repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 19c0cdb9e6271956015232421ef7f63a1ad001ae I get an error message when I do `guix system reconfigure config.scm`: Backtrace: In guix/ui.scm: 1654:12 19 (run-guix-command _ . _

bug#34850: ghc compiling error

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > mikadoZero, > > mikadoZero wrote: >> `guix describe` >> guix fd4c7a0 >> repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git >> branch: master >> commit: fd4c7a098a508c1de7a8513c0f3d88d5a0df12e7 >>

bug#34850: ghc compiling error

`guix describe` guix fd4c7a0 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: fd4c7a098a508c1de7a8513c0f3d88d5a0df12e7 I have ghc in my system configuration file. I have just done a pull and reconfigure. `which ghc` /run/current-system/profile/bin/ghc

bug#34833: Package search warning about newt

A pull and reconfigure shows it is fixed. Thanks Jack Hill writes: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, mikadoZero wrote: > >> guix 0d5101c >>repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git >>branch: master >>commit: 0d5101c3a341d28b5f2277c2f0087674e

bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > mikadoZero writes: > >> Is it common for the Scheme variable to be different from the package >> name? What benefit is there to it being different compared to it being >> the same? > > It is not very common, but sometimes it is necessary

bug#34833: Package search warning about newt

Ludovic Courtès writes: > My bad, fixed in 3f4f2ee404d328cbfb846aa18aafa33ee6ae3cff. > > Thanks! > > Ludo’. I have pulled and reconfigured. `guix describe` guix 0d5101c repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 0d5101c3a341d28b5f2277c2f0087674e1

bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package

Leo Famulari writes: > The package is named 'iproute2' but the Scheme variable, which is what > %base-packages is a list of, is named 'iproute'. Thank you for the clarification. Is it common for the Scheme variable to be different from the package name? What benefit is there to it being differ

bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package

Julien Lepiller writes: > iproute2 provides the "ip" command. Try "ip a" for instance to list your > devices and addresses. Does it work? That works. Thank you for explaining that.

bug#34835: iproute in %base-packages but no matching package

guix describe: guix 1bc24bb repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 1bc24bbf00e21a26d9eb71e5c89d941812dcdad7 which iproute: iproute not found In system.scm in the definition of %base-packages there is iproute but if I search for it there is no

bug#34833: Package search warning about newt

guix describe: guix 1bc24bb repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 1bc24bbf00e21a26d9eb71e5c89d941812dcdad7 I have just started getting warning about newt when I search for packages. For example `guix package -s iproute` outputs this: guix p

bug#34829: usbutils description same as synopsis

The description of the usbutils package is the same as it's synopsis. It mentions that it includes tools but only mentions one. It would be nice if the description provided further information.

bug#34828: psmisc description vague

The description for the psmisc package would be more helpful if it listed the utilities that it included. As it is I do not know what I will get after installing. An example of a description that is more helpful is procps.

bug#34718: wget2 install error

Efraim Flashner writes: > Fixed in commit f5e08f1793f7c36641f1b4d879b5dc3f016a4a53 Thanks it is installing fine now.

bug#34719: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-json-reformat: Fix test.

Oleg Pykhalov writes: > Hi mikadoZero, > > Thank you for the report. > > You could try ‘guix reconfigure’ after ‘guix pull’. Thanks that fixes the error I was getting. Do you think this failing test should be reported to it's upstream? I looked at it's GitHub issues

bug#34803: (no subject)

The IPA for Guix is not being rendered correctly in footnote 2 of section 1 Introduction of the PDF version of the Guix manual.

bug#34719: `guix describe` output

The output of `guix describe` is: guix 35556d7 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 35556d7da01f00ffdbc9b3218ef2669dd28e3b62

bug#34718: output of `guix describe`

When I run `guix describe` I get: guix 35556d7 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 35556d7da01f00ffdbc9b3218ef2669dd28e3b62

bug#34719: emacs-json-mode check phase failing

When I add `emacs-json-mode` to my Guix SD configuration and run `guix system reconfigure` I get this error: building /gnu/store/3m18s0yhkyikgb2z1ivr321h4vrhi9nl-emacs-json-reformat-0.0.6.drv.. . \ 'check' phasebu

bug#34718: wget2 install error

After adding `wget2` to my Guix SD configuration and running `guix system reconfigure` I get this error message. building /gnu/store/grs07r02plfc3idadnj6jyf7s7ibarsq-wget2-1.0.0.drv... - 'build' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/grs07r02plfc3idadnj6jyf7s7ibarsq-wget2-1.0.0. drv' failed with exit code

bug#34597: `guix challenge` - 41 packages differ

Attached are diffs for three of the packages listed in the `guix challenge` output that were listed as differing. diff -ru --no-dereference /gnu/store/9z98cvjm7p7z21xdid1ryydxy5vyz6wr-python-3.7.0/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pip-10.0.1.dist-info/RECORD /tmp/python/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pip

bug#34597: `guix challenge` - 41 packages differ

As requested. Output from `guix describe`: guix 34372d3 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 34372d3905e17c880180f811e5b5f83e423e9025 Output from `diffoscope` for three different packages that `guix challenge` highlighted as differing:

bug#34597: `guix challenge` - 41 packages differ

Two packages did not have guix in their name are: guile-2.2.4 python-3.7.0 Thank you for referencing that documentation. I will take a look at it.

bug#34597: `guix challenge` - 41 packages differ

After running `guix challenge` there are some packages which differ from ones I have built locally. `guix --version`: guix (GNU Guix) 34372d3905e17c880180f811e5b5f83e423e9025 Here is the relevant output from `guix challenge`: - 41 (1.6%) differed /gnu/store/0yzw2jrpzf0f4gg2i3dqy80ddkgrgf5c-gui