Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> Here is a version of the patch that works with the upstream Python, but
> that I cannot get to work with our Guix recipe.
At first sight the patch LGTM. How does it not work for you? :-)
I applied this:
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/python-3-deterministic-build-i
Here is a version of the patch that works with the upstream Python, but
that I cannot get to work with our Guix recipe.
Could you test it and tell me what you think? I intend to push this to
CPython.
Cyril.
diff --git a/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py b/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py
index c4ee41a..d988
Here is a version of the patch that works with the upstream Python, but
that I cannot get to work with our Guix recipe.
Could you test it and tell me what you think? I intend to push this to
CPython.
Cyril.
diff --git a/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py b/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py
index c4ee41a..d988
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:41:19PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Could you give it a try and refine as needed? :-)
I altered your example as shown in the attached patch. It causes some
tests related to timestamps to fail, so I disabled them in a very crude
way. The final patch should address th
Leo Famulari skribis:
> We fixed this in python-2 with the patch
> python-2.7-source-date-epoch.patch, but I don't know how to write this
> patch for python-3.
I would imagine something like this (untested):
--- Python-3.4.3/Lib/importlib/_bootstrap.py 2016-02-02 21:38:48.655809055 +0100
+++ Py
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:15:44AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> While preparing a package for borg [0], I found that the built output
> was not reproducible. The problem is that the bytecode compiler [1] for
> Python 3.4.3 (our current version) encodes the mtime of the
> corresponding Python source
While preparing a package for borg [0], I found that the built output
was not reproducible. The problem is that the bytecode compiler [1] for
Python 3.4.3 (our current version) encodes the mtime of the
corresponding Python source file in the output. This is described in
PEP-3147 [2], and the respon
