bug#23056: (no subject)

2016-03-24 Thread Ludovic Courtès
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > So what happens is that (1) substitutes were not available for the > ‘guix’ package, which is why it ended up being built, and (2) /tmp is > indeed a FUSE file system on the installation image (unionfs), hence the > weird FUSE things that get in the way

bug#23056: (no subject)

2016-03-23 Thread Bartosz Duszel
Hello all, Had the same issue. Mounting as tmpfs helped. @Kei - thanks for sharing. Best regards, dptd > On 22 Mar 2016, at 23:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > k...@openmailbox.org skribis: > >> On 2016-03-21 18:50, l...@gnu.org wrote: >>> Kei skribis: >>>

bug#23056: (no subject)

2016-03-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
k...@openmailbox.org skribis: > On 2016-03-21 18:50, l...@gnu.org wrote: >> Kei skribis: >> >>> I've managed to get guix to build by running >>> >>> mount -t tmpfs tmp /tmp >>> >>> prior to building. I've tried it on two separate hard drives. >> >> OK, good. >> >>>

bug#23056: (no subject)

2016-03-22 Thread kei
On 2016-03-21 18:50, l...@gnu.org wrote: Kei skribis: I've managed to get guix to build by running mount -t tmpfs tmp /tmp prior to building. I've tried it on two separate hard drives. OK, good. Perhaps you can try and replicate my results? No, I’d really need

bug#23056: (no subject)

2016-03-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Kei skribis: > I've managed to get guix to build by running > > mount -t tmpfs tmp /tmp > > prior to building. I've tried it on two separate hard drives. OK, good. > Perhaps you can try and replicate my results? No, I’d really need to know the answer to the questions

bug#23056: (no subject)

2016-03-21 Thread Kei
I've managed to get guix to build by running mount -t tmpfs tmp /tmp prior to building. I've tried it on two separate hard drives. Perhaps you can try and replicate my results? Kei