Hi,
Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas skribis:
> Pushed to master as f00e68ace0 with these changes, after running the
> tests and booting up my system.
Woohoo, thank you!
Ludo’.
Hi Ludo,
First of all, thanks for your review. :-)
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Miguel,
>
> Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas skribis:
>> + (define (crypto-devices)
>> +(define (crypto-device->cryptomount dev)
>> + (if (uuid? dev)
>> + #~(format port "cryptomount -u ~a~%"
>> +
Hi Miguel,
Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas skribis:
>>From 52993db19da43699ea96ea16ebb051b9652934f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Miguel=20=C3=81ngel=20Arruga=20Vivas?=
>
> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 16:31:17 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] system: Allow separated /boot and encrypted root.
In this v2 I've fixed two flaws I saw in the previous patch: the
parameter store-crypto-devices now has the empty list as default value,
and now the function documents for the parameter too.
Happy hacking!
Miguel
>From 52993db19da43699ea96ea16ebb051b9652934f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8
Hello!
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Does that cause GRUB to mount all the LUKS partitions it was aware of at
> installation time, or does it cause it to scan all the partitions in
> search of a LUKS signature?
>
> In the latter case that wouldn’t be great, but in the former case it
> sounds like we
