Maxim Cournoyer (2017-08-15 12:08 -0400) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
[...]
> A side note: this is one of the reasons why I don't like "guix.d"
> sub-directory. I think it is a useless extra level in the file
> hierarchy. If we used:
>
> .../share
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Alex Kost wrote:
> Adonay Felipe Nogueira (2017-07-13 09:20 -0300) wrote:
>
> > It seems that Emacs ESS mode isn't installed in the same location as
> > other packages are.
> >
> > Also note that emacs-ess doesn't use the Emacs build system. I don't
> > know
Indeed, I also wonder if the "guix.d" directory is a good idea to keep
or not.
Thank you very much for the fix too. :)
--
- [[https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno]]
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, use o
Alex Kost (2017-07-18 16:52 +0300) wrote:
> Adonay Felipe Nogueira (2017-07-13 09:20 -0300) wrote:
>
>> It seems that Emacs ESS mode isn't installed in the same location as
>> other packages are.
>>
>> Also note that emacs-ess doesn't use the Emacs build system. I don't
>> know if this is indeed t
Adonay Felipe Nogueira (2017-07-13 09:20 -0300) wrote:
> It seems that Emacs ESS mode isn't installed in the same location as
> other packages are.
>
> Also note that emacs-ess doesn't use the Emacs build system. I don't
> know if this is indeed the issue (and if we can force it to use such
> buil
It seems that Emacs ESS mode isn't installed in the same location as
other packages are.
Also note that emacs-ess doesn't use the Emacs build system. I don't
know if this is indeed the issue (and if we can force it to use such
build system), but I think this is an important note to make.
The user
