bug#29072: The usability of Guix configurations

Hello, myglc2 skribis: > My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I > thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu > package code had been moved, my system configuration had become broken > ;-( It should be noted that you were

bug#29072: The usability of Guix configurations

On 11/06/2017 at 17:16 Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0500, myglc2 wrote: >> My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I >> thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu >> package code had been moved, my system configuration

bug#29072: The usability of Guix configurations

Please note: these replies are separated by topics in an effort to make the threads more topical ... On 11/06/2017 at 17:16 Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0500, myglc2 wrote: [...] >> Guix config errors are reported as raw scheme errors which are not >> user-friendly,

bug#29072: The usability of Guix configurations

Please note: these replies separated by topics in an effort to make the threads more topical ... On 11/06/2017 at 22:16 Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0500, myglc2 wrote: >> My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I >> thought was a bug

bug#29072: The usability of Guix configurations

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 03:12:11PM -0500, myglc2 wrote: > My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I > thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu > package code had been moved, my system configuration had become broken > ;-( > > Confronted with my

bug#29072: The usability of Guix configurations

My system recently broke when I did an upgrade. I reported what I thought was a bug (bug#29072) but it turned out that, because qemu package code had been moved, my system configuration had become broken ;-( Confronted with my situation, helpful developers said "The package code was moved in