Hi ludo! Thanks. You were correct. Thank you.-- Original message--From:
Ludovic CourtèsDate: Fri, Apr 12, 2019 2:52 PMTo: bre...@posteo.net;Cc:
35...@debbugs.gnu.org;Subject:Re: bug#35242: Backtrace on building with load
pathbre...@posteo.net skribis:
> brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system
bre...@posteo.net skribis:
> brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L .
[...]
> In gnu/packages.scm:
>260:33 7 (fold-packages # gnu/packages.scm:304:35 …> …)
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
>466:18 6 (fold # result)> …)
> In guix/discovery.scm:
>136:31 5 (_ "." ())
>
Hi T G-R,
Unless I am doing this incorrectly, it doesn't change the output.
brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ export COLUMNS
brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L .
Backtrace:
In guix/store.scm:
613:10 19 (call-with-store #guix/scripts/build.scm:889:8…>)
In guix
Brett,
bre...@posteo.net wrote:
Backtrace:
Could you ‘export COLUMNS’ so we can see the backtrace in its
untruncated glory?
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi all. I am trying to build custom packages, and today a regression may
have been introduced either on guix-master or in my own channel. I am
trying to find out where the issue lies.
brettg@guixsd ~/Repos/guix-system [env]$ guix build fstar -L .
Backtrace:
In guix/store.scm:
613:10 19 (call
