bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: Ludovic Courtès wrote: e0244eb7a2290781ef490b6cedbd9c753caf6004. Hmm. I guess I'll give ‘SRFI-45 - Primitives for Expressing Iterative Lazy Algorithms’(?) a read, then. Never mind, that was the first ‘->’ that looked relevant at first glance but it's metasynt

bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-12 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Ludovic Courtès wrote: e0244eb7a2290781ef490b6cedbd9c753caf6004. Hmm. I guess I'll give ‘SRFI-45 - Primitives for Expressing Iterative Lazy Algorithms’(?) a read, then. Thanks, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-12 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Commit 48d498c2c3984784336b27ba5e261319f3ac6a3a lets HOME pass >> through, which should sidestep the problem you encountered. > > This breaks ‘guix pull’, but I can't for the life of me see how HOME > is being applied here. Ouch, so

bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-11 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: Ludovic Courtès wrote: Commit 48d498c2c3984784336b27ba5e261319f3ac6a3a lets HOME pass through, which should sidestep the problem you encountered. This breaks ‘guix pull’, but I can't for the life of me see how HOME is being applied here. I've reverted the chang

bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-11 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Ludo', Ludovic Courtès wrote: Commit 48d498c2c3984784336b27ba5e261319f3ac6a3a lets HOME pass through, which should sidestep the problem you encountered. This breaks ‘guix pull’, but I can't for the life of me see how HOME is being applied here. Could you enlighten me? Kind regards, T G-R

bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Karrick McDermott skribis: > 1. Glad you identified why `HOME` was unset, due to the > `with-clean-environment` function. I am surprised a few environment variables > are not conveyed through the code path, as `ssh` does for variables it deems > safe, including `HOME`, `LOGNAME`, `TZ`,

bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-10 Thread Karrick McDermott
that far in the instructions. I'm reading through those now. -Original Message- From: Ludovic Courtès Date: Friday, May 10, 2019 at 6:23 PM To: Karrick McDermott Cc: "35...@debbugs.gnu.org" <35...@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Re: bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull fa

bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Karrick McDermott skribis: > In ./guix/utils.scm: >661:47 1 (xdg-directory _ "/.config" #:ensure? _) > In unknown file: >0 (getpw 10452) > > ERROR: In procedure getpw: > In procedure getpw: entry not found > -guix pull: [1;31merror: [0mYou found a bug: the program > '/gnu/

bug#35623: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7

2019-05-10 Thread Karrick McDermott
I accidentally sent this to Mark's private account rather than the per-bug address. Re-sending it as requested. -Original Message- From: Karrick McDermott Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 8:17 PM To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7 Here's the script