bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration

2020-12-13 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari skriver: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:24:55PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> > To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I >> > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within >> > the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? >> >> I agr

bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration

2020-12-13 Thread Leo Famulari
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:24:55PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I > > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within > > the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? > > I agree. We should do that in the n

bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration

2020-05-31 Thread Aiko Kyle
> To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin > method, I > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration > within > the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? I agree. We should do that in the next ‘core-updates’. I recently ran into this bug myself and was su

bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration

2019-07-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Mark H Weaver skribis: > The 'set-paths' phase in (guix build gnu-build-system) currently > includes 'source' in the set of candidates for inclusion in the > search-path variables. Oh, that was certainly not intended. > First of all, I think it's undesirable to include subdirectories of

bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration

2019-07-07 Thread Mark H Weaver
The 'set-paths' phase in (guix build gnu-build-system) currently includes 'source' in the set of candidates for inclusion in the search-path variables. First of all, I think it's undesirable to include subdirectories of the source directory in these search paths. However, if you think it's desira