Hi,
Robert Vollmert skribis:
> Specifically, building guix-packages.drv locally, I got the output below.
> As far as I can tell, the problematic file’s name is not contained in the
> output at all. The file is certainly available where we call compile-file
> — no idea whether it would be better
Specifically, building guix-packages.drv locally, I got the output below.
As far as I can tell, the problematic file’s name is not contained in the
output at all. The file is certainly available where we call compile-file
— no idea whether it would be better to print the filename while handling
