bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-27 Thread Brett Gilio
Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Brett Gilio writes: > > > [...] > >> Leo and Maxim, >> >> Do you think this feature addition to the emacs-build-system is good to >> be pushed, then? I think it looks quite fine but I want to double check >> before potentially doing something dumb. > > LGTM! > > Thank

bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-26 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Brett Gilio writes: [...] > Leo and Maxim, > > Do you think this feature addition to the emacs-build-system is good to > be pushed, then? I think it looks quite fine but I want to double check > before potentially doing something dumb. LGTM! Thank you! Maxim

bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-23 Thread Brett Gilio
Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hello, > > Leo Prikler > > [...] > >> Regarding the impact, I think it should be fine if we commit this >> closely before or after #38619, since that probably forces all Elisp >> libraries to be rebuilt anyways (also CC'd Maxim to have a look at >> this). Hopefully at

bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-16 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hello, Leo Prikler [...] > Regarding the impact, I think it should be fine if we commit this > closely before or after #38619, since that probably forces all Elisp > libraries to be rebuilt anyways (also CC'd Maxim to have a look at > this). Hopefully at least the doom-theme autoloads compile

bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-15 Thread Brett Gilio
Leo Prikler writes: > Regarding the impact, I think it should be fine if we commit this > closely before or after #38619, since that probably forces all Elisp > libraries to be rebuilt anyways (also CC'd Maxim to have a look at > this). Hopefully at least the doom-theme autoloads compile

bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-15 Thread Leo Prikler
Am Sonntag, den 15.12.2019, 16:26 -0600 schrieb Brett Gilio: > [...] > I am not sure why the file permissions are needing to be set either. > On > a git checkout it looks to me like they are the same as the others. I > wonder if it might have something to do with the rename-file method > moving

bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-15 Thread Brett Gilio
Leo Prikler writes: > Hey Brett. > > Am Dienstag, den 14.12.2019, 13:45 -0600 schrieb Brett Gilio: >> Just forwarding along an idea discussed between Leo Prikler, Tobias, >> and I on IRC. > Thanks for the mention ;) Any time! :) > >> Obviously just outright deleting the phase responsible for

bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-14 Thread Leo Prikler
Hey Brett. Am Dienstag, den 14.12.2019, 13:45 -0600 schrieb Brett Gilio: > Just forwarding along an idea discussed between Leo Prikler, Tobias, > and I on IRC. Thanks for the mention ;) > Obviously just outright deleting the phase responsible for > bytecompilation is not the _best_ solution. So

bug#38613: Disabling bytecompilation on a list of files.

2019-12-14 Thread Brett Gilio
Hey all. Just forwarding along an idea discussed between Leo Prikler, Tobias, and I on IRC. Recently I was trying to update our emacs-doom-themes package to a fresher commit since it offers numerous new functionalities but there is not a marked stable release of the package. In the process I