Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Brett Gilio writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
>> Leo and Maxim,
>>
>> Do you think this feature addition to the emacs-build-system is good to
>> be pushed, then? I think it looks quite fine but I want to double check
>> before potentially doing something dumb.
>
> LGTM!
>
> Thank
Brett Gilio writes:
[...]
> Leo and Maxim,
>
> Do you think this feature addition to the emacs-build-system is good to
> be pushed, then? I think it looks quite fine but I want to double check
> before potentially doing something dumb.
LGTM!
Thank you!
Maxim
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hello,
>
> Leo Prikler
>
> [...]
>
>> Regarding the impact, I think it should be fine if we commit this
>> closely before or after #38619, since that probably forces all Elisp
>> libraries to be rebuilt anyways (also CC'd Maxim to have a look at
>> this). Hopefully at
Hello,
Leo Prikler
[...]
> Regarding the impact, I think it should be fine if we commit this
> closely before or after #38619, since that probably forces all Elisp
> libraries to be rebuilt anyways (also CC'd Maxim to have a look at
> this). Hopefully at least the doom-theme autoloads compile
Leo Prikler writes:
> Regarding the impact, I think it should be fine if we commit this
> closely before or after #38619, since that probably forces all Elisp
> libraries to be rebuilt anyways (also CC'd Maxim to have a look at
> this). Hopefully at least the doom-theme autoloads compile
Am Sonntag, den 15.12.2019, 16:26 -0600 schrieb Brett Gilio:
> [...]
> I am not sure why the file permissions are needing to be set either.
> On
> a git checkout it looks to me like they are the same as the others. I
> wonder if it might have something to do with the rename-file method
> moving
Leo Prikler writes:
> Hey Brett.
>
> Am Dienstag, den 14.12.2019, 13:45 -0600 schrieb Brett Gilio:
>> Just forwarding along an idea discussed between Leo Prikler, Tobias,
>> and I on IRC.
> Thanks for the mention ;)
Any time! :)
>
>> Obviously just outright deleting the phase responsible for
Hey Brett.
Am Dienstag, den 14.12.2019, 13:45 -0600 schrieb Brett Gilio:
> Just forwarding along an idea discussed between Leo Prikler, Tobias,
> and I on IRC.
Thanks for the mention ;)
> Obviously just outright deleting the phase responsible for
> bytecompilation is not the _best_ solution. So
Hey all.
Just forwarding along an idea discussed between Leo Prikler, Tobias, and
I on IRC.
Recently I was trying to update our emacs-doom-themes package to a
fresher commit since it offers numerous new functionalities but there is
not a marked stable release of the package. In the process I