bug#42301: Build of GNU Solfege fails

2021-07-05 Thread Tim Magee
It works for me now. I will close if nobody beats me to it. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

bug#42301: Build of GNU Solfege fails

2021-07-05 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 15:46, Tim Magee wrote: > It works for me now. I will close if nobody beats me to it. Thanks. So closing. (-: All the best, simon

bug#42301: Build of GNU Solfege fails

2021-07-05 Thread Michael Rohleder
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Fine by me, but I'm not the OP. dito. -- Thus spake the master programmer: "Without the wind, the grass does not move. Without software, hardware is useless." -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming" signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#42301: Build of GNU Solfege fails

2021-07-05 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, zimoun writes: > Using Guix 3694c0d, the package ’solfege’ builds and the substitute is > available. The package ’lilypond’ too. > > Something probably changed in the dependency chain since commit > 145484e8f5d89911f5f905c9fe604e3cbfd1e434 (fail). > > Closing? Fine by me, but I'm not

bug#42301: Build of GNU Solfege fails

2021-07-05 Thread zimoun
Hi, Using Guix 3694c0d, the package ’solfege’ builds and the substitute is available. The package ’lilypond’ too. Something probably changed in the dependency chain since commit 145484e8f5d89911f5f905c9fe604e3cbfd1e434 (fail). Closing? All the best, simon

bug#42301: Build of GNU Solfege fails

2020-07-09 Thread Tim Magee
GNU Solfege 3.22.2 refuses to build. Here is what I believe is the relevant part of the log file: Converting to PNG...LC_ALL=C makeinfo -I topdocs --no-split --no-headers --output FAQ topdocs/FAQ.texi utf8 "\xF6" does not map to Unicode at